Collinder 143
(Collinder 142; NGC 2384; MWSC 1216; OCL 618; ESO 559 09)
0.72
UTI
0.51
CN
0.35
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
1.8 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.51 Moderately populated
- Cdens 0.35 Loose
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Collinder 143 is a moderately populated, loose object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 111.309 | -21.013 | 0.342 | -2.31 | 3.12 | 26.347 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 111.291 | -21.021 | 0.33 | -2.303 | 3.118 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 111.291 | -21.021 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 111.287 | -21.022 | 0.341 | -2.314 | 3.109 | 26.354 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 111.346 | -20.995 | 0.342 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 111.287 | -21.022 | 0.341 | -2.314 | 3.109 | 26.354 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 111.291 | -21.018 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 111.279 | -21.018 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 111.316 | -20.987 | 0.364 | -2.292 | 3.131 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 111.291 | -21.021 | 0.33 | -2.303 | 3.118 | â |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 111.289 | -21.012 | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 111.285 | -21.022 | â | -5.137 | 1.854 | 49.5 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 111.279 | -21.018 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 111.292 | -21.022 | â | -1.29 | 1.37 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 111.285 | -21.02 | â | -6.44 | 3.29 | 49.5 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 111.292 | -21.022 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 111.28 | -21.016 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 111.28 | -21.02 | â | 0.13 | â | 49.54 |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 111.3 | -21.023 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 111.28 | -21.02 | â | -5.89 | 2.86 | 49.54 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 111.3 | -21.02 | â | -5.43 | 3.22 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 111.292 | -21.022 | â | -1.29 | 1.37 | 53.25 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 111.292 | -21.022 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 2.49 | 0.86 | 0.74 | 14 | -0.139 | 294 | 0.72 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.84 | 0.82 | â | 32 | -0.068 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.49 | 0.98 | â | 21 | â | 205 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 264(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.62 | 0.93 | â | 19 | -0.370 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.09 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 67 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.27 | 0.91 | â | 24 | -0.130 | 313(1) | 0.72 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 13 | â | 294 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 2.78(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.49 | 0.98 | â | 21 | -0.147 | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.09 | 0.78 | â | 9 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.07 | 1.23 | â | 13 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.07 | 1.23 | â | 13 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.90 | â | â | 14 | â | 490 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 2.12 | 0.81 | â | 13 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 2.12 | 0.81 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 2.12 | 0.81 | â | 13 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 2.13 | 0.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 3.07 | 0.96 | â | 14 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 3.16 | 0.86 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.