Collinder 132
(MWSC 1147)
0.81
UTI
0.62
CN
0.45
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
2.2 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.62 Moderately populated
- Cdens 0.45 Loose
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Collinder 132 is a moderately populated, loose object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a low-mass, near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 108.4 | -30.829 | 1.524 | -4.151 | 3.758 | 19.036 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 108.485 | -30.758 | 1.501 | -4.14 | 3.732 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 108.595 | -30.703 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 108.752 | -31.126 | 1.485 | -4.146 | 3.711 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 108.346 | -30.971 | 1.525 | -4.125 | 3.727 | 18.565 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 108.485 | -30.758 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 108.549 | -30.822 | 1.529 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 108.346 | -30.971 | 1.525 | -4.125 | 3.727 | 18.565 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 108.355 | -30.973 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 108.79 | -30.672 | 1.49 | -4.067 | 3.547 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 108.485 | -30.758 | 1.501 | -4.14 | 3.732 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 108.595 | -30.703 | 1.5 | -4.128 | 3.687 | 36.91 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 108.485 | -30.758 | 1.501 | -4.14 | 3.732 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 108.485 | -30.758 | 1.501 | -4.14 | 3.732 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 108.483 | -30.758 | 1.501 | -4.14 | 3.732 | 27.339 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 108.485 | -30.758 | â | â | â | 24.13 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 108.485 | -30.758 | 1.501 | -4.14 | 3.732 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 108.84 | -30.682 | â | -1.685 | 3.679 | 28.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 108.355 | -30.973 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 108.833 | -30.683 | â | -0.95 | 2.44 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 108.36 | -30.975 | â | -5.3 | 4.71 | 28.0 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 108.833 | -30.683 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 108.385 | -31.028 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 108.84 | -30.68 | â | 0.3 | â | 28.0 |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 108.4 | -31.033 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 108.39 | -31.03 | â | -5.9 | 5.09 | 28.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 108.39 | -31.03 | â | -5.42 | 5.52 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 108.833 | -30.683 | â | -2.01 | 2.9 | 26.58 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.63 | 0.11 | 0.52 | 25 | 0.037 | 49 | â | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.81 | 0.18 | â | 27 | 0.149 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.65 | 0.20 | â | 31 | â | 195 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.63 | 0.00 | â | 25 | 0.037 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 49(1) | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 24 | â | 196 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.67 | 0.46 | â | 8 | -0.290 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.63 | 0.12 | 0.52 | 14 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 32 | â | 5 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 0.71(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 0.65 | 0.09 | â | 12 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.65 | 0.20 | â | 31 | 0.037 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.63 | 0.00 | â | 25 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 0.66 | 0.16 | â | 47 | -0.013 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.42 | 0.09 | â | 11 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.33 | 0.07 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.33 | 0.07 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.47 | â | â | 12 | â | 15 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.41 | 0.06 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 0.47 | 0.12 | â | 12 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.41 | 0.06 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 0.47 | 0.12 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.47 | 0.11 | â | 12 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.