Collinder 110

(Collinder 110A; MWSC 941; OCL 530; FSR 1049; FoF 79)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 38.2 [N/pc2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Collinder 110 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 99.681 2.076 0.434 -1.094 -2.046 37.694
Li et al. 2025 99.677 2.069 0.425 -1.091 -2.049 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 99.675 2.073 – – – –
Wei et al. 2025 99.676 2.099 0.452 -1.035 -1.964 –
Carrasco-Varela et al. 2025 99.872 2.026 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 99.675 2.072 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 99.697 2.073 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 99.697 2.073 0.435 -1.093 -2.039 32.191
Cavallo et al. 2024 99.675 2.073 0.434 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 99.697 2.073 0.435 -1.093 -2.039 32.191
Just et al. 2023 99.668 2.036 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 99.675 2.081 0.45 -1.099 -2.049 –
Rain et al. 2021 99.677 2.069 0.425 -1.091 -2.049 –
Dias et al. 2021 99.675 2.072 0.423 -1.103 -2.049 38.169
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 99.677 2.069 0.425 -1.091 -2.049 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 99.6 2.017 – -1.129 -2.144 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 99.677 2.069 0.425 -1.091 -2.049 –
Liu & Pang 2019 99.669 2.075 0.432 -1.087 -2.025 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 99.677 2.069 – – – 38.17
Bica et al. 2019 99.662 2.025 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 99.677 2.069 0.425 -1.091 -2.049 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 99.675 2.035 – 0.485 1.684 38.7
Kharchenko et al. 2016 99.668 2.036 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 99.6 2.017 – -1.31 -3.28 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 99.675 2.035 – 2.28 -2.55 –
Gozha et al. 2012 99.6 2.017 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 99.742 2.022 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 99.646 2.04 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 99.75 2.02 – -1.42 0.13 –
Dias et al. 2002 99.6 2.017 – -1.31 -3.28 38.7

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.2 1.435 1.12 1455 -0.010 4813 0.63 0.06
Li et al. 2025 2.22 1.46 – 1883 -0.054 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.140(5) – – –
Wei et al. 2025 3.87 1.83 – 1290 0.000 5129 0.63 –
Carrasco-Varela et al. 2025 2.40 1.64 – 1455 -0.050 – – 0.06(1)
Almeida et al. 2025 1.99 1.64 – 1455 – 4497 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.229(1) – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 8614(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.16 1.41 – 1514 0.260 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.11 1.37 1.12 1503 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 1660 – 1932 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 2.25(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 2.20 1.55 – 1413 – – – 8
Dias et al. 2021 1.99 1.64 – 1455 0.023 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.19 1.14 – 1820 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.20 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 1780 0.250 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.20 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.20 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 3.50 1.38 – 1445 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.36 1.29 – 1660 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.36 1.29 – 1660 – – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 1.95 – – 1413 0.030 – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.45 0.99 – 155 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 1.95 1.55 – 1413 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.45 0.99 – 155 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.95 1.55 – 1413 -0.020 – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️