Collinder 106
(MWSC 936)
0.89
UTI
0.82
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.62
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
6.9 [arcmin]
- CN 0.82 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.62 Intermediate quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Collinder 106 is a rich, very dense object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 99.29 | 6.037 | 0.653 | -1.584 | 0.521 | 26.713 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 99.278 | 6.002 | 0.635 | -1.472 | 0.531 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 99.202 | 5.931 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 99.295 | 6.05 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 99.295 | 6.05 | 0.666 | -1.623 | 0.524 | 25.925 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 99.278 | 6.002 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 99.286 | 6.031 | 0.661 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 99.295 | 6.05 | 0.666 | -1.623 | 0.524 | 25.925 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 99.3 | 6.071 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 99.202 | 5.931 | 0.633 | -1.48 | 0.52 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 99.278 | 6.002 | 0.635 | -1.472 | 0.531 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 99.278 | 6.002 | 0.635 | -1.472 | 0.531 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 99.278 | 6.002 | 0.635 | -1.472 | 0.531 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 99.3 | 6.07 | â | -0.898 | -0.581 | 28.7 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 99.3 | 6.071 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 99.275 | 5.95 | â | 0.75 | -1.11 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 99.307 | 6.07 | â | -2.0 | 0.5 | 28.7 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 99.275 | 5.95 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 99.334 | 5.951 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 99.27 | 5.95 | â | 0.52 | â | 28.72 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 99.34 | 5.95 | â | -1.98 | 1.47 | 28.72 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 99.33 | 5.98 | â | -1.17 | 1.82 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 99.275 | 5.95 | â | 0.75 | -1.11 | 35.66 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.39 | 0.70 | â | 17 | 0.122 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.35 | 0.95 | â | 16 | â | 426 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | 0.041* | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 342* | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 24 | â | 455 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.47 | 0.76 | â | 9 | 0.170 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.41 | 0.77 | 1.39 | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 3 | â | 736 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.35 | 0.95 | â | 16 | -0.062 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.51 | 0.63 | â | 25 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.51 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.51 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.63 | 0.42 | â | 7 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.58 | 0.97 | â | 3 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.58 | 0.97 | â | 3 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.77 | â | â | 7943 | â | 10965 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.60 | 0.71 | â | 5 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.60 | 0.71 | â | 5 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 0.77 | 0.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.00 | 0.37 | â | 7943 | -0.260 | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.