COIN-Gaia 2
(COIN 2; FoF 2208)
0.00
UTI
0.78
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.6
Clit
0.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
8.8 [arcmin]
- CN 0.78 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.6 Moderately studied
- Cdup 0.0 Very likely duplicate
Overview
COIN-Gaia 2 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
â ī¸ Warning: This is very likely a duplicate object, which shares a large percentage of members with at least one previously reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 15.054 | 55.409 | 0.773 | -4.438 | -2.055 | -32.253 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 15.06 | 55.409 | 0.787 | -4.457 | -1.933 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 15.052 | 55.401 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 15.103 | 55.392 | 0.773 | -4.44 | -2.06 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 15.06 | 55.409 | 0.787 | -4.457 | -1.933 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 15.052 | 55.401 | 0.808 | -4.474 | -1.945 | -31.991 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 15.06 | 55.409 | 0.787 | -4.457 | -1.933 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 15.06 | 55.409 | 0.787 | -4.457 | -1.933 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 15.081 | 55.405 | 0.772 | -4.454 | -1.901 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 15.06 | 55.409 | â | â | â | 2.317 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2019 | 15.06 | 55.409 | 0.79 | -4.46 | -1.96 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.16 | 0.78 | â | 587 | 0.028 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.12 | 0.99 | â | 585 | â | 418 | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 1.17 | â | â | 724 | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.23 | 0.87 | â | 427 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.12 | 0.99 | â | 585 | -0.054 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.20 | 0.46 | â | 661 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.23 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 537 | -0.750 | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 1.18 | 0.89 | â | 432 | 0.017 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2019 | 1.23 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.