COIN-Gaia 17
(COIN 17)
0.07
UTI
0.75
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.6
Clit
0.1
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
8.8 [arcmin]
- CN 0.75 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.6 Moderately studied
- Cdup 0.1 Likely duplicate
Overview
COIN-Gaia 17 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
â ī¸ Warning: This is likely a duplicate object, which shares a large percentage of members with at least one previously reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 81.23 | 37.571 | 0.894 | 0.285 | -4.308 | 8.916 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 81.244 | 37.558 | 0.885 | 0.358 | -4.297 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 81.22 | 37.538 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 81.239 | 37.525 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 81.2 | 37.568 | 0.908 | 0.275 | -4.301 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 81.22 | 37.563 | 0.889 | 0.289 | -4.281 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 81.22 | 37.538 | 0.902 | 0.387 | -4.281 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 81.244 | 37.558 | 0.885 | 0.358 | -4.297 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 81.244 | 37.558 | 0.885 | 0.358 | -4.297 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 81.244 | 37.558 | â | â | â | 2.668 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2019 | 81.244 | 37.558 | 0.89 | 0.36 | -4.28 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.07 | 1.35 | â | 200 | -0.074 | 264 | 0.58 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.07 | 1.30 | â | 128 | -0.033 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.04 | 1.48 | â | 86 | â | 265 | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.06 | 1.44 | â | 133 | -0.142 | 264(1) | 0.58 | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 1.35 | â | 355 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 1.05 | â | â | 372 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.04 | 1.48 | â | 86 | -0.115 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.08 | 0.75 | â | 398 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.09 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 1.25 | 1.30 | â | 266 | 0.018 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2019 | 1.09 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.