Bochum 6
0.73
UTI
0.75
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.38
CC3
0.75
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
6.4 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.75 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.38 Low quality
- Clit 0.75 Well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Bochum 6 is a rich, very dense object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a significant percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 112.984 | -19.408 | 0.256 | -2.252 | 2.299 | 66.967 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 113.01 | -19.421 | â | â | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 112.992 | -19.416 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2023 | 112.901 | -19.394 | 0.349 | -2.332 | 3.454 | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 113.002 | -19.416 | 0.267 | -2.257 | 2.284 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 112.992 | -19.416 | 0.249 | -2.28 | 2.308 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 113.01 | -19.421 | 0.253 | -2.284 | 2.265 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 112.992 | -19.416 | 0.249 | -2.28 | 2.308 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 112.992 | -19.416 | 0.249 | -2.28 | 2.308 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 112.992 | -19.416 | 0.249 | -2.28 | 2.308 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 112.965 | -19.39 | â | -4.219 | 5.373 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 113.0 | -19.417 | â | -1.19 | 2.37 | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 113.0 | -19.433 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 113.0 | -19.417 | â | -1.19 | 2.37 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 3.6 | 1.95 | â | 10 | -0.095 | 510 | â | 0.0 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.15 | 1.95 | â | 13 | â | 523 | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 6 | â | 498 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2023 | 2.75 | 1.80 | â | 25 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 3.86(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 3.60 | 2.17 | â | 10 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.15 | 1.95 | â | 13 | -0.095 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.93 | 1.59 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 3.60 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 3.60 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.66 | 0.64 | â | 1349 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 3.98 | 2.17 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 3.98 | 2.17 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.