Blanco 1
(MWSC 7; zeta Scl; OCL 43; ESO 409 09)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
6.4 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Blanco 1 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and age parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a significant percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.222 | -29.948 | 4.226 | 18.75 | 2.597 | 5.193 |
| Yan et al. | 2026 | 0.915 | -30.011 | 4.232 | 18.725 | 2.593 | â |
| Malhotra et al. | 2026 | 0.767 | -29.815 | â | â | â | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.853 | -29.958 | 4.21 | 18.739 | 2.602 | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 1.356 | -29.922 | 4.189 | 18.721 | 2.605 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 0.915 | -30.011 | 4.232 | 18.725 | 2.593 | 4.217 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.861 | -29.907 | 4.228 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.915 | -30.011 | 4.232 | 18.725 | 2.593 | 4.217 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 31.717 | -30.047 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 0.878 | -30.003 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 0.872 | -29.975 | 4.224 | 18.738 | 2.606 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.72 | -30.116 | 4.219 | 18.722 | 2.567 | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 1.003 | -29.939 | 4.231 | 18.737 | 2.602 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 0.853 | -29.958 | 4.21 | 18.739 | 2.602 | â |
| Richer et al. | 2021 | 0.964 | -29.945 | 4.202 | 18.7 | 2.648 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.634 | -29.941 | 4.204 | 18.689 | 2.724 | 5.754 |
| Spina et al. | 2021 | 1.099 | -29.953 | 4.191 | 18.729 | 2.63 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.853 | -29.958 | 4.21 | 18.739 | 2.602 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.853 | -29.958 | 4.21 | 18.739 | 2.602 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.853 | -29.958 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.853 | -29.958 | â | â | â | 5.76 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 1.027 | -29.832 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.853 | -29.958 | 4.21 | 18.739 | 2.602 | â |
| Yen et al. | 2018 | 1.056 | -29.928 | 4.11 | 18.65 | 2.63 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.035 | -29.833 | â | 20.17 | 3.0 | 5.5 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.878 | -30.003 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 1.029 | -29.833 | â | 9.84 | -3.82 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.885 | -30.0 | â | 19.71 | 2.28 | 5.5 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.029 | -29.833 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.822 | -30.143 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 1.03 | -29.83 | â | 2.9 | â | 3.58 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.822 | -30.143 | â | â | â | â |
| Ahumada & Lapasset | 2007 | 1.025 | -29.833 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 0.825 | -30.133 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.82 | -30.14 | â | 19.86 | 2.37 | 3.58 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 0.82 | -30.14 | â | 19.86 | 3.37 | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 1.063 | -29.882 | â | 20.17 | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.029 | -29.833 | â | 20.17 | 3.0 | 5.53 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.24 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 93 | 0.000 | 1725 | 0.23 | 0 |
| Yan et al. | 2026 | â | â | â | 104 | â | â | â | â |
| Malhotra et al. | 2026 | 0.24 | 0.02 | â | 279 | 0.040 | â | â | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.25 | 0.16 | â | 85 | 0.055 | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.24 | 0.01 | â | 79 | -0.015 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 465(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.24 | 0.36 | â | 83 | 0.050 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.40 | 173 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.23 | 0.01 | â | 100 | -0.024 | 338(1) | 0.23 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 56 | â | 436 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.05 | â | 63 | â | â | â | â |
| Spina et al. | 2022 | â | â | â | â | -0.053 | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.24 | â | â | 107 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 0.23(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 0.24 | 0.03 | â | 93 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Richer et al. | 2021 | â | 0.09 | â | 105 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.24 | 0.06 | â | 103 | -0.016 | â | â | â |
| Spina et al. | 2021 | 0.24 | â | â | 105 | -0.056(20) | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.24 | 0.01 | â | 105 | â | â | â | â |
| Kounkel et al. | 2020 | 0.25 | 0.24 | â | 91 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.24 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.24 | 0.03 | â | 94 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.24 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.24 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Yen et al. | 2018 | 0.25 | 0.02 | â | 145 | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.25 | 0.03 | â | 63 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.25 | 0.04 | â | 56 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.25 | 0.04 | â | 56 | -0.188 | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.27 | â | â | 63 | 0.040 | 3020 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.27 | 0.03 | â | 209 | â | 4426(1) | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.27 | 0.03 | â | 209 | â | 2985 | â | â |
| Ahumada & Lapasset | 2007 | â | 0.03 | â | 63 | â | â | â | 1 |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 0.27 | 0.03 | â | 63 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.27 | 0.03 | â | 209 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 0.26 | 0.03 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 0.27 | 0.03 | â | 60 | 0.230(1) | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.27 | 0.03 | â | 63 | 0.040 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Malhotra et al. (2026)
Lowest/Highest stellar mass in the catalogue with a mass-ratio estimate: 0.18/3.01 Msun
Yan et al. (2026)
Number of WDs: expected from single-star evolution N=3, with probability of formation through binary evolution >=0.5 N=1.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).
Richer et al. (2021)
The expected number of WDs is 3.2, 0 WD candidates found, and 0 WD candidates found in the wide search.
Rain et al. (2021)
This cluster was include in (Dias et al., 2002A&A...389..871D, Cat. B/ocl) however, parameters log(t)=7.975, Av=0.031, [Fe/H]=0.00 were taken from Bossini et al. (2019A&A...623A.108B, Cat. J/A+A/623/A108). Ahumada & Lapasset (2007A&A...463..789A, Cat. J/A+A/463/789) cite star Zeta Sculptoris=HD 224990=DR2 2320885329010329216 as a possible blue straggler however, according to Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018A&A...618A..93C, Cat. J/A+A18/A93) it is not a member.
Ahumada & Lapasset (2007)
Zeta Sculptoris=HD 224990. The identification chart is in the ubvy photometry (1988A&AS...76..101W), where the star Zeta Scl is cited as a blue straggler and is given the following: (b-y)=-0.064, (u-b)= 0.518, m1=0.101, c1=0.441, and spectrum B6III-B5V.