Biurakan 2
(MWSC 3267)
0.90
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
8.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Biurakan 2 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 302.301 | 35.468 | 0.545 | -3.17 | -6.886 | -26.93 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 302.283 | 35.488 | 0.542 | -3.169 | -6.843 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 302.295 | 35.502 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 302.322 | 35.464 | 0.544 | -3.195 | -6.893 | -22.689 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 302.283 | 35.488 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 302.333 | 35.483 | 0.546 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 302.322 | 35.464 | 0.544 | -3.195 | -6.893 | -22.689 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 302.303 | 35.503 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 302.312 | 35.477 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 302.301 | 35.475 | 0.573 | -3.187 | -6.83 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 302.283 | 35.488 | 0.542 | -3.169 | -6.843 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 302.295 | 35.502 | 0.548 | -3.158 | -6.843 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 302.283 | 35.488 | 0.542 | -3.169 | -6.843 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 302.283 | 35.488 | 0.542 | -3.169 | -6.843 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 302.283 | 35.488 | 0.542 | -3.169 | -6.843 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 302.295 | 35.483 | â | -0.128 | -0.825 | -22.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 302.312 | 35.477 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 302.3 | 35.483 | â | -1.95 | -4.49 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 302.317 | 35.48 | â | -3.3 | -5.6 | -22.0 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 302.3 | 35.483 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 302.288 | 35.477 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 302.29 | 35.48 | â | 0.18 | â | -22.0 |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 302.3 | 35.483 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 302.29 | 35.48 | â | -3.63 | -6.24 | -22.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 302.29 | 35.48 | â | -3.6 | -6.31 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 302.3 | 35.483 | â | -1.95 | -4.49 | -19.66 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 302.3 | 35.483 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.19 | 1.31 | â | 4 | 0.071 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.64 | 1.38 | â | 9 | â | 368 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 268* | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 9 | â | 298 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.55 | 1.41 | â | 8 | -0.060 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.16 | 4 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.73 | 1.42 | â | 8 | 0.027 | 627* | 0.73 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 17 | â | 97 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 1.76* | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.75 | 1.12 | â | 10 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.64 | 1.38 | â | 9 | 0.145 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.72 | 0.93 | â | 9 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.75 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.75 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.15 | 1.10 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.14 | 1.12 | â | 17 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.14 | 1.12 | â | 17 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.11 | â | â | 10 | â | 138 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.11 | 1.12 | â | 14 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 1.11 | 1.12 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.11 | 1.12 | â | 14 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.11 | 1.12 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.11 | 1.12 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 1.45 | 1.30 | â | 16 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.