Bica 2
0.80
UTI
0.78
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.6
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
4.8 [arcmin]
- CN 0.78 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.6 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Bica 2 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a small percentage of members with at least one entry reported in the same catalogue. See table with shared members information.
Relatively close
High extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 308.311 | 41.299 | 0.578 | -2.684 | -4.409 | -13.559 |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 308.173 | 41.219 | 0.581 | -2.689 | -4.334 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 308.315 | 41.307 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 308.319 | 41.301 | 0.576 | -2.691 | -4.413 | 6.897 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 308.311 | 41.302 | 0.577 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 308.319 | 41.301 | 0.576 | -2.691 | -4.413 | 6.897 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 308.317 | 41.306 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 308.315 | 41.307 | 0.555 | -2.66 | -4.378 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 308.31 | 41.313 | â | -0.179 | -0.551 | -28.0 |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 308.312 | 41.312 | â | -0.49 | -3.56 | -28.0 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 308.312 | 41.312 | â | -0.49 | -3.56 | -28.0 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 1.69 | 4.71 | â | 6 | 0.500 | 11328 | 0.59 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.55 | 4.13 | â | 6 | â | 1072 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1654* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.69 | 4.71 | â | 5 | 0.520 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.67 | 5.59 | 2.99 | 4 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.59 | 4.49 | â | 5 | 0.059 | 2150* | 0.86 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.55 | 4.13 | â | 6 | 0.100 | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.64 | 3.96 | â | 41 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.80 | 5.64 | â | 4 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.