Berkeley 98
(FSR 0361; MWSC 3655; OCL 234; FoF 48)
0.96
UTI
0.81
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
3.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.81 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 98 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Distant
Low extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Old
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | β | 340.665 | 52.408 | 0.25 | -1.352 | -3.255 | -69.802 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 340.665 | 52.407 | 0.253 | -1.353 | -3.186 | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 340.661 | 52.408 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 340.644 | 52.415 | β | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 340.67 | 52.405 | 0.251 | -1.348 | -3.258 | -69.962 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 340.661 | 52.408 | 0.253 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 340.67 | 52.405 | 0.251 | -1.348 | -3.258 | -69.962 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 340.647 | 52.364 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 340.644 | 52.415 | 0.255 | -1.334 | -3.214 | -64.464 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 340.665 | 52.407 | 0.253 | -1.353 | -3.186 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 340.658 | 52.388 | β | -1.33 | -3.176 | β |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | 340.654 | 52.368 | β | -1.41 | -3.23 | -64.9 |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 340.665 | 52.407 | 0.253 | -1.353 | -3.186 | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 340.67 | 52.407 | 0.278 | -1.366 | -3.142 | β |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 340.664 | 52.41 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 340.665 | 52.407 | 0.253 | -1.353 | -3.186 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 340.665 | 52.388 | β | -5.278 | 0.432 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 340.647 | 52.364 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 340.658 | 52.388 | β | -0.47 | -1.52 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 340.654 | 52.368 | β | -5.83 | -0.37 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 340.654 | 52.368 | β | -5.83 | -0.37 | β |
| Froebrich et al. | 2007 | 340.679 | 52.411 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 340.658 | 52.388 | β | -0.47 | -1.52 | β |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 3.49 | 0.70 | β | 2925 | 0.010 | β | β | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | β | β | β | β | -0.140* | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.45 | 0.74 | β | 3342 | β | 749 | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | β | β | β | β | β | 1084* | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.59 | 1.47 | β | 2692 | -0.910 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.76 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 1219 | β | β | β | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | β | β | β | 2089 | β | 3119 | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.45 | 0.74 | β | 3342 | -0.059 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.52 | 0.61 | β | 2455 | β | β | β | β |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | β | β | β | β | 0.000 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 3.54 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | β | β | β | 2950 | 0.000 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 3.54 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.71 | 0.88 | β | 1122 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 4.20 | 0.62 | β | 2089 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 4.20 | 0.62 | β | 2089 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 4.20 | 0.62 | β | 2089 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 3.74 | 0.40 | β | 2512 | β | β | β | β |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.