Berkeley 9
(MWSC 286; OCL 388; FSR 0646; FoF 722)
0.91
UTI
0.8
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
3.2 [arcmin]
- CN 0.8 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 9 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Old
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | β | 53.164 | 52.651 | 0.555 | 1.494 | -0.005 | -17.034 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 53.167 | 52.649 | 0.513 | 1.493 | 0.037 | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 53.166 | 52.651 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 53.163 | 52.651 | β | β | β | β |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 53.174 | 52.652 | β | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 53.174 | 52.652 | 0.547 | 1.484 | -0.024 | -15.467 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 53.166 | 52.651 | 0.555 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 53.174 | 52.652 | 0.547 | 1.484 | -0.024 | -15.467 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 53.152 | 52.649 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 53.163 | 52.651 | 0.505 | 1.508 | 0.06 | -17.248 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 53.167 | 52.649 | 0.513 | 1.493 | 0.037 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 53.163 | 52.654 | β | 1.409 | -0.101 | β |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | 53.163 | 52.65 | β | 1.57 | -0.1 | -16.9 |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 53.167 | 52.649 | 0.513 | 1.493 | 0.037 | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 53.178 | 52.64 | 0.518 | 1.516 | 0.02 | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 53.167 | 52.649 | β | β | β | -17.4 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 53.162 | 52.645 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 53.167 | 52.649 | 0.513 | 1.493 | 0.037 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 53.16 | 52.654 | β | -2.826 | -1.962 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 53.152 | 52.649 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 53.163 | 52.654 | β | 1.07 | -0.57 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 53.163 | 52.65 | β | -2.39 | -2.43 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 53.163 | 52.65 | β | -2.39 | -2.43 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 53.163 | 52.654 | β | 1.07 | -0.57 | β |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.51 | 2.77 | β | 2455 | -0.078 | β | β | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | β | β | β | β | 0.040* | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.79 | 3.01 | β | 1521 | β | 626 | β | β |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | β | β | β | β | 0.005* | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | β | β | β | β | β | 1176* | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.71 | 3.06 | β | 1514 | 0.040 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.68 | 3.04 | 1.02 | 859 | β | β | β | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | β | β | β | 1995 | β | 53 | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.79 | 3.01 | β | 1521 | -0.186 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.81 | 2.69 | β | 1380 | β | β | β | β |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | β | β | β | β | -0.090 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.85 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | β | β | β | 3090 | 0.000 | β | β | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.85 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.85 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.29 | 2.38 | β | 1445 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.55 | 2.33 | β | 1995 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.55 | 2.33 | β | 1995 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 1.55 | 2.33 | β | 1995 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.48 | 2.45 | β | 1995 | β | β | β | β |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.