Berkeley 82

(MWSC 3065; OCL 103; FoF 2246)

0.90 UTI

0.77

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

C3 classification AB

Number of members (P>50%) 149

Radius (P>50% members) 5.3 [arcmin]

C_N 0.77 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Berkeley 82 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for Berkeley 82 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	–	287.834	13.118	0.714	0.062	-3.173	-2.388
Li et al.	2025	287.845	13.111	0.708	0.178	-3.168	–
Almeida et al.	2025	287.843	13.113	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	287.838	13.117	0.729	0.028	-3.196	7.376
Cavallo et al.	2024	287.826	13.133	0.728	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	287.838	13.117	0.729	0.028	-3.196	7.376
Just et al.	2023	287.829	13.094	–	–	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	287.834	13.111	0.743	0.013	-3.168	–
Rain et al.	2021	287.845	13.111	0.708	0.178	-3.168	–
Dias et al.	2021	287.843	13.113	0.723	0.172	-3.206	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	287.845	13.111	0.708	0.178	-3.168	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	287.845	13.111	0.708	0.178	-3.168	–
Liu & Pang	2019	287.832	13.099	0.709	-0.033	-3.158	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	287.845	13.111	–	–	–	-2.63
Bica et al.	2019	287.84	13.1	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	287.845	13.111	0.708	0.178	-3.168	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	287.835	13.118	–	-0.06	-4.38	-2.8
Kharchenko et al.	2016	287.829	13.094	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	287.833	13.118	–	0.1	2.27	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	287.835	13.096	–	-0.9	-4.54	-2.8
Gozha et al.	2012	287.833	13.118	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	287.833	13.111	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	287.833	13.118	–	-0.06	-4.38	-2.8
Dambis	1999	287.833	13.111	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	Bfr	BSS
Li et al.	2025	0.80	2.16	–	632	0.145	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.31	2.78	–	190	–	118	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	748*	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.25	2.91	–	132	-0.140	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.33	2.78	1.50	93	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	115	–	127	–	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	1.31	–	–	120	–	–	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	1.35*	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	1.36	3.16	–	31	–	–	–	0
Dias et al.	2021	1.31	2.78	–	190	0.299	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	1.37	2.43	–	105	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.36	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Liu & Pang	2019	–	–	–	234	-1.250	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	1.36	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.36	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	0.86	3.17	–	31	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	1.12	2.84	–	115	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	1.12	2.84	–	115	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	0.86	–	–	31	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	0.86	3.16	–	31	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	0.86	3.17	–	31	–	–	–	–
Dambis	1999	0.87	3.21	–	50	–	–	–	–

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3