Berkeley 8
(FSR 0545; MWSC 158; OCL 323; FoF 652)
0.89
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.84
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Nm (P>50%)
761
Core radius and density
1.8 [pc], 14 [pc-2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.84 Well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 8 is a very rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, well above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 30.292 | 75.486 | 0.282 | 2.652 | 0.375 | -28.826 |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 30.309 | 75.478 | â | â | â | â |
| Yang et al. | 2025 | 30.297 | 75.491 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 30.308 | 75.48 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 30.297 | 75.491 | 0.285 | 2.664 | 0.375 | -29.159 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 30.309 | 75.478 | 0.278 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 30.297 | 75.491 | 0.285 | 2.664 | 0.375 | -29.159 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 30.306 | 75.481 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 30.337 | 75.491 | â | â | â | â |
| Jadhav & Subramaniam | 2021 | 30.306 | 75.489 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 30.308 | 75.48 | 0.244 | 2.667 | 0.429 | -28.168 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 30.306 | 75.489 | 0.25 | 2.65 | 0.439 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 30.306 | 75.489 | 0.25 | 2.65 | 0.439 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 30.276 | 75.472 | 0.277 | 2.656 | 0.467 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 30.306 | 75.489 | â | â | â | -27.88 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 30.228 | 75.484 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 30.306 | 75.489 | 0.25 | 2.65 | 0.439 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2018 | â | â | â | 2.04 | 0.35 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 30.27 | 75.483 | â | 2.113 | -2.203 | â |
| Sampedro et al. | 2017 | 30.275 | 75.483 | â | 1.99 | -1.56 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 30.337 | 75.491 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 30.275 | 75.483 | â | 0.99 | -3.08 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 30.352 | 75.493 | â | 1.73 | -1.85 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 30.352 | 75.493 | â | 1.62 | -1.82 | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2011 | 30.283 | 75.489 | â | â | â | â |
| Froebrich et al. | 2007 | 30.296 | 75.487 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 30.275 | 75.483 | â | 0.99 | -3.08 | â |
| Lynga | 1987 | 30.289 | 75.573 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 3.28 | 1.87 | 1.58 | 2143 | -0.212 | 4347 | 0.83 | 3 |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | 0.000(5) | â | â | â |
| Yang et al. | 2025 | â | â | â | 1906 | -0.290(3) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.20 | 2.08 | â | 3499 | â | 3259 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 3.28 | 1.99 | 1.58 | 1921 | â | 4347(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 3.01 | 2.44 | â | 2512 | -0.420 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.28 | 1.99 | 1.58 | 1923 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 3.01 | 2.21 | â | 3365 | -0.175 | 1073(1) | 0.83 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 1995 | â | 8831 | â | â |
| Jadhav & Subramaniam | 2021 | 3.34 | 1.75 | â | 3631 | â | 7094 | â | 3(1) |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.20 | 2.08 | â | 3499 | -0.077 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.34 | 1.75 | â | 3631 | â | â | â | â |
| Kounkel et al. | 2020 | 3.19 | 1.67 | â | 2291 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 3.58 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 1660 | -0.250 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 3.58 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 3.58 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.30 | 2.55 | â | 1202 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 5.00 | 1.26 | â | 1995 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 5.00 | 1.26 | â | 1995 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 5.00 | 1.26 | â | 1995 | â | â | â | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2011 | 3.96(1) | 1.29 | â | 3162 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 3.15 | 2.37 | â | 3162 | â | â | â | â |
| Lynga | 1987 | 1.49 | 1.23 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.91 (50th percentile).
Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.91 (50th percentile).
Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.0555, e_all=0.0769.