Berkeley 70
(MWSC 538; OCL 422; FSR 0743)
0.93
UTI
0.9
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
27.1 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.9 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 70 is a very rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 81.457 | 41.951 | 0.213 | 0.849 | -1.884 | -13.697 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 81.457 | 41.951 | 0.177 | 0.947 | -1.864 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 81.467 | 41.958 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 81.46 | 41.949 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 81.454 | 41.95 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 81.454 | 41.95 | 0.215 | 0.832 | -1.875 | -10.821 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 81.467 | 41.958 | 0.216 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 81.454 | 41.95 | 0.215 | 0.832 | -1.875 | -10.821 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 81.431 | 41.931 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 81.459 | 41.963 | 0.183 | 0.92 | -1.917 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 81.457 | 41.951 | 0.177 | 0.947 | -1.864 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 81.46 | 41.949 | 0.176 | 0.993 | -1.874 | -15.164 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 81.457 | 41.951 | 0.177 | 0.947 | -1.864 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 81.457 | 41.951 | 0.177 | 0.947 | -1.864 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 81.457 | 41.951 | â | â | â | -15.12 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 81.466 | 41.962 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 81.457 | 41.951 | 0.177 | 0.947 | -1.864 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 81.42 | 41.93 | â | -0.38 | -1.492 | -15.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 81.431 | 41.931 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 81.425 | 41.9 | â | 0.1 | 3.39 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 81.441 | 41.93 | â | -0.81 | -5.4 | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 81.425 | 41.9 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 81.441 | 41.93 | â | -0.81 | -5.4 | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 81.436 | 41.896 | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 81.422 | 41.904 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 81.425 | 41.9 | â | 0.1 | 3.39 | -15.0 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 4.59 | 1.55 | 2.31 | 2292 | -0.320 | 1653 | â | 12.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 4.57 | 2.09 | â | 2344 | -0.652 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.250(5) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 4.59 | 1.56 | â | 2891 | â | 3161 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | 0.124(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1653(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 3.61 | 1.90 | â | 2239 | -0.560 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 4.02 | 1.70 | 2.31 | 904 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 2239 | â | 1493 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 5.86(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 4.85 | 1.49 | â | 4677 | â | â | â | 12 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 4.59 | 1.56 | â | 2891 | 0.006 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 4.97 | 1.23 | â | 2188 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 4.85 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 4.85 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 4.85 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.94 | 0.90 | â | 1259 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 5.00 | 1.55 | â | 2239 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 5.00 | 1.55 | â | 2239 | -0.320 | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 4.17 | â | â | 4677 | -0.320 | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 5.00 | 1.55 | â | 2239 | -0.320 | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 4.16 | 1.49 | â | 4677 | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 4.16 | 1.49 | â | 4000 | -0.320(1) | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 4.17 | 1.49 | â | 4677 | -0.010 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: worst fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.