Berkeley 69
(FSR 0793; MWSC 532; OCL 444)
0.91
UTI
0.81
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
19.7 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.81 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 69 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Note: This object shares a small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 81.09 | 32.608 | 0.275 | 0.756 | -1.948 | 39.014 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 81.09 | 32.607 | 0.259 | 0.806 | -1.937 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 81.104 | 32.61 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 81.088 | 32.603 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 81.091 | 32.608 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 81.091 | 32.608 | 0.273 | 0.739 | -1.954 | 31.679 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 81.104 | 32.61 | 0.275 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 81.091 | 32.608 | 0.273 | 0.739 | -1.954 | 31.679 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 81.087 | 32.605 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 81.088 | 32.609 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 81.096 | 32.613 | 0.284 | 0.822 | -1.933 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 81.09 | 32.607 | 0.259 | 0.806 | -1.937 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 81.088 | 32.603 | 0.248 | 0.791 | -1.951 | 40.227 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 81.09 | 32.607 | 0.259 | 0.806 | -1.937 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 81.09 | 32.607 | 0.259 | 0.806 | -1.937 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 81.09 | 32.607 | â | â | â | 39.92 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 81.091 | 32.61 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 81.09 | 32.607 | 0.259 | 0.806 | -1.937 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 81.09 | 32.608 | â | 0.7 | -1.18 | 5.2 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 81.088 | 32.609 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 81.097 | 32.608 | â | 2.69 | -5.82 | 5.2 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 81.15 | 32.65 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 81.097 | 32.608 | â | 2.43 | -5.73 | 5.2 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 81.15 | 32.65 | â | 0.03 | â | â |
| Froebrich et al. | 2007 | 81.088 | 32.604 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 81.15 | 32.65 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 81.15 | 32.65 | â | 5.9 | -12.51 | 5.2 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 3.11 | 2.08 | 2.06 | 891 | -0.223 | 952 | 0.72 | 1.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 3.12 | 2.09 | â | 932 | -0.134 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.280(5) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.11 | 2.10 | â | 863 | â | 891 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.234(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1604(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.75 | 2.23 | â | 1096 | -0.360 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.28 | 2.01 | 2.06 | 413 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.86 | 2.10 | â | 971 | -0.212 | 508(1) | 0.72 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 1023 | â | 1012 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 3.48(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 3.47 | 2.02 | â | 891 | â | â | â | 1 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.11 | 2.10 | â | 863 | -0.175 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.40 | 1.61 | â | 794 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 3.47 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 3.47 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 3.47 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 4.34 | 2.04 | â | 618 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.80 | 2.08 | â | 1023 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.80 | 2.08 | â | 1023 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.86 | â | â | 891 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 2.80 | 2.08 | â | 1026 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 1.68 | 2.08 | â | 245 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.86 | 2.02 | â | 891 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.