Berkeley 68
(MWSC 412; OCL 413; FSR 0713; FoF 186)
0.95
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
13.6 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 68 is a very rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 71.046 | 42.138 | 0.293 | 2.244 | -1.382 | -18.39 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 71.053 | 42.134 | 0.281 | 2.31 | -1.312 | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 71.054 | 42.131 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 71.065 | 42.114 | β | β | β | β |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 71.049 | 42.161 | β | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 71.049 | 42.161 | 0.295 | 2.243 | -1.387 | -19.204 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 71.054 | 42.131 | 0.296 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 71.049 | 42.161 | 0.295 | 2.243 | -1.387 | -19.204 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 71.105 | 42.1 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 71.065 | 42.114 | 0.28 | 2.357 | -1.29 | -21.539 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 71.053 | 42.134 | 0.281 | 2.31 | -1.312 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 71.125 | 42.067 | β | 2.19 | -1.281 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 71.053 | 42.134 | 0.281 | 2.31 | -1.312 | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 71.076 | 42.139 | 0.281 | 2.321 | -1.322 | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 71.053 | 42.134 | β | β | β | -20.31 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 71.058 | 42.136 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 71.053 | 42.134 | 0.281 | 2.31 | -1.312 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 71.115 | 42.1 | β | -5.231 | -0.734 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 71.105 | 42.1 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 71.125 | 42.067 | β | -0.63 | 0.05 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 71.115 | 42.1 | β | -5.86 | 0.3 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 71.115 | 42.1 | β | -5.86 | 0.3 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 71.125 | 42.067 | β | -0.63 | 0.05 | β |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 3.005 | 2.08 | 1.32 | 1387 | -0.165 | 2082 | β | β |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.98 | 2.01 | β | 1894 | -0.261 | β | β | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | β | β | β | β | -0.090(5) | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.03 | 2.08 | β | 1914 | β | 2082 | β | β |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | β | β | β | β | -0.240(1) | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | β | β | β | β | β | 3139(1) | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.96 | 1.89 | β | 1862 | -0.060 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.13 | 1.77 | 1.32 | 1387 | β | β | β | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | β | β | β | 1288 | β | 137 | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.03 | 2.08 | β | 1914 | -0.286 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.39 | 1.38 | β | 2089 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 3.22 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | β | β | β | 1450 | 0.500 | β | β | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 3.22 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 3.22 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.72 | 2.06 | β | 251 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.80 | 2.08 | β | 1288 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.80 | 2.08 | β | 1288 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 1.80 | 2.08 | β | 1288 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.68 | 2.08 | β | 246 | β | β | β | β |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.