Berkeley 62
(MWSC 97)
0.90
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
2.6 [arcmin]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 62 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 15.316 | 63.93 | 0.36 | -2.17 | -0.395 | -20.649 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 15.311 | 63.916 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 15.313 | 63.941 | 0.355 | -2.176 | -0.415 | -20.648 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 15.309 | 63.918 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 15.347 | 63.924 | 0.357 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 15.313 | 63.941 | 0.355 | -2.176 | -0.415 | -20.648 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 15.322 | 63.913 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 15.267 | 63.932 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 15.314 | 63.93 | 0.389 | -2.174 | -0.323 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 15.309 | 63.918 | 0.36 | -2.15 | -0.353 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 15.311 | 63.916 | 0.36 | -2.149 | -0.342 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 15.309 | 63.918 | 0.36 | -2.15 | -0.353 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 15.309 | 63.918 | 0.36 | -2.15 | -0.353 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 15.309 | 63.918 | â | â | â | -57.59 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 15.309 | 63.918 | 0.36 | -2.15 | -0.353 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 15.27 | 63.935 | â | -0.961 | 2.632 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 15.267 | 63.932 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 15.25 | 63.95 | â | -2.07 | -1.37 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 15.277 | 63.935 | â | -2.65 | 1.7 | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 15.25 | 63.95 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 15.277 | 63.935 | â | -2.65 | 1.7 | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 15.25 | 63.95 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 15.25 | 63.95 | â | -2.07 | -1.37 | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 15.25 | 63.95 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.50 | 2.47 | â | 12 | â | 708 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1238* | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 15 | â | 660 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.92 | 2.67 | â | 14 | 0.230 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.54 | 2.60 | 2.00 | 19 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.63 | 2.50 | â | 19 | -0.127 | 1895* | 0.63 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 20 | â | 180 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 2.58* | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.57 | 2.63 | â | 16 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.50 | 2.47 | â | 12 | -0.101 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.65 | 2.09 | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.57 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.57 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.57 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.07 | 2.24 | â | 25 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.00 | 2.27 | â | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.00 | 2.27 | â | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.32 | â | â | 16 | -0.850 | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 2.00 | 2.27 | â | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 1.84 | 2.63 | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.32 | 2.63 | â | 16 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 1.65 | 2.77 | â | 16 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.