Berkeley 57
(NGC 7423; MWSC 3674; OCL 246; FSR 0391)
0.91
UTI
0.8
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
60.6 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.8 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 57 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 343.788 | 57.098 | 0.252 | -1.217 | -1.289 | -37.501 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 343.789 | 57.096 | 0.239 | -1.247 | -1.25 | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 343.796 | 57.089 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 343.782 | 57.092 | β | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 343.788 | 57.099 | 0.252 | -1.217 | -1.293 | -37.606 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 343.796 | 57.089 | 0.251 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 343.788 | 57.099 | 0.252 | -1.217 | -1.293 | -37.606 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 343.785 | 57.093 | β | β | β | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 343.785 | 57.092 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 343.782 | 57.092 | 0.241 | -1.257 | -1.229 | -38.0 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 343.789 | 57.096 | 0.239 | -1.247 | -1.25 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 343.783 | 57.097 | β | -1.31 | -1.074 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 343.789 | 57.096 | 0.239 | -1.247 | -1.25 | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 343.789 | 57.096 | β | β | β | -38.43 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 343.8 | 57.095 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 343.789 | 57.096 | 0.239 | -1.247 | -1.25 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 343.785 | 57.097 | β | 0.719 | 0.361 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 343.785 | 57.092 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 343.783 | 57.097 | β | -1.43 | -4.32 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 343.791 | 57.095 | β | 3.91 | 1.24 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 343.791 | 57.095 | β | 3.91 | 1.24 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 343.783 | 57.097 | β | -1.43 | -4.32 | β |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 3.75 | 1.915 | 1.76 | 1330 | -0.186 | 1448 | 0.81 | β |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 3.79 | 1.96 | β | 1360 | -0.046 | β | β | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | β | β | β | β | -0.220(5) | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.75 | 1.97 | β | 1403 | β | 1122 | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | β | β | β | β | β | 1775(1) | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.84 | 2.27 | β | 1622 | -0.480 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.60 | 1.81 | 1.76 | 1194 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 3.69 | 2.11 | β | 1330 | -0.186 | 776(1) | 0.81 | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | β | β | β | 796 | β | 1849 | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.75 | 1.97 | β | 1403 | -0.061 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.98 | 1.20 | β | 1585 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 3.73 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 3.73 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 3.73 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.99 | 1.87 | β | 891 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 6.00 | 1.55 | β | 796 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 6.00 | 1.55 | β | 796 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 6.00 | 1.55 | β | 796 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 4.15 | 2.33 | β | 1413 | β | β | β | β |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.