Berkeley 50
(MWSC 3273)
0.84
UTI
0.8
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.69
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
63.4 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.8 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.69 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 50 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 302.503 | 34.968 | 0.24 | -3.376 | -5.112 | -28.783 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 302.505 | 34.967 | 0.246 | -3.398 | -5.072 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 302.486 | 34.963 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 302.507 | 34.968 | 0.237 | -3.369 | -5.13 | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 302.494 | 34.966 | 0.236 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 302.507 | 34.968 | 0.237 | -3.369 | -5.13 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 302.515 | 34.967 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 302.486 | 34.963 | 0.243 | -3.387 | -5.081 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 302.505 | 34.967 | 0.246 | -3.398 | -5.072 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 302.515 | 34.967 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 302.6 | 34.967 | â | -3.35 | -4.44 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 302.52 | 34.97 | â | -1.06 | -2.39 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 302.6 | 34.967 | â | -1.06 | -2.39 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 3.37 | 2.39 | 2.32 | 170 | 0.072 | 907 | â | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.38 | 1.16 | â | 2105 | 0.072 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.62 | 2.85 | â | 6 | â | 907 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 2344(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 4.15 | 2.92 | â | 117 | 0.670 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.79 | 3.00 | 2.32 | 52 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 237 | â | 569 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.62 | 2.85 | â | 6 | -0.162 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.37 | 2.12 | â | 76 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.95 | 2.39 | â | 237 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.95 | 2.39 | â | 237 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.65 | 2.33 | â | 224 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.