Berkeley 5

(MWSC 142; OCL 331)

0.73 UTI

0.78

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

0.56

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 172

Core radius and density 1.3 [pc], 7.2 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.78 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 0.56 Moderately studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Berkeley 5 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, above the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Very distant High extinction Massive Intermediate age Contains BSS

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.1824, e_all=0.5175.

Data

🔍 Search references for Berkeley 5 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	26.931	62.941	0.13	-1.599	0.677	-98.399
Just et al.	2023	26.913	62.93	–	–	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	26.928	62.935	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	26.928	62.935	0.088	-1.61	0.764	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	26.928	62.935	0.088	-1.61	0.764	–
Bica et al.	2019	26.928	62.946	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	26.928	62.935	0.088	-1.61	0.764	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	26.913	62.93	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	26.925	62.933	–	0.11	-2.78	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	26.925	62.933	–	0.11	-2.78	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	26.938	62.941	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	26.95	62.933	–	0.11	-2.78	–
Lynga	1987	26.923	62.936	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	6.23	4.015	–	676	–	2511	–	5
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	676	–	282	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	7.08	3.46	–	1148	–	4740	–	5⁽¹⁾
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	7.08	3.46	–	1148	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	4.35	3.93	–	525	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	8.56	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	8.56	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	6.00	4.41	–	676	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	6.00	4.41	–	676	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	6.00	4.41	–	676	–	–	–	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	6.26⁽¹⁾	2.84	–	1122	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	6.20	4.10	–	794	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2