Berkeley 44

(MWSC 3082; OCL 110; FSR 0138; FoF 474)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.89 UTI
0.87
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.9
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 1.0 [pc], 23 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.87 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.9 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Berkeley 44 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.71 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.71 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.2123, e_all=0.1965.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 289.313 19.552 0.341 -0.044 -2.867 -8.451
Otto et al. 2026 289.314 19.548 – 0.01 -2.83 -9.3
Hu & Soubiran 2025 289.311 19.551 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 289.311 19.549 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 289.314 19.548 0.343 -0.053 -2.878 -10.9
Cavallo et al. 2024 289.311 19.551 0.338 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 289.314 19.548 0.343 -0.053 -2.878 -10.9
Just et al. 2023 289.302 19.541 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 289.313 19.55 – – – –
Netopil et al. 2022 289.313 19.55 – – – -7.54
Dias et al. 2021 289.311 19.549 0.308 0.004 -2.848 3.198
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 289.313 19.55 0.303 0.007 -2.834 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 289.3 19.55 – 0.025 -2.755 –
Donor et al. 2020 289.308 19.543 – -0.17 -3.17 23.0
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 289.313 19.55 0.303 0.007 -2.834 –
Liu & Pang 2019 289.318 19.545 0.306 -0.038 -2.83 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 289.313 19.55 – – – 7.63
Bica et al. 2019 289.322 19.537 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 289.313 19.55 0.303 0.007 -2.834 –
Dib et al. 2018 289.308 19.543 – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 289.32 19.561 – 1.893 -7.555 -9.6
Sampedro et al. 2017 289.3 19.55 – 0.92 -4.23 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 289.302 19.541 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 289.3 19.55 – 0.99 -4.92 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 289.308 19.543 – 1.76 -7.9 –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 289.308 19.56 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 289.3 19.55 – 0.99 -4.92 -9.6
Lynga 1987 289.298 19.537 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.76 3.3 1.96 1413 0.000 2172 – 0
Otto et al. 2026 – – – 1445 0.160(15) – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – 0.000(5) – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.80 3.30 – 1151 – 2172 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 2.72 3.92 1.96 1009 – 4680(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.90 3.93 – 813 -0.140 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.72 3.92 1.96 1009 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 1413 – 843 – –
Spina et al. 2022 – – – – 0.000 – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 2.86 2.75 – 1445 – 3673 – 0(1)
Netopil et al. 2022 2.86(1) – – 1445 0.000(1) – – –
Dias et al. 2021 2.80 3.30 – 1151 0.066 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.86 2.75 – 1445 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 2.62 3.22 – 1622 – – – –
Donor et al. 2020 – – – – 0.000 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 3.02 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 1200 0.500 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 3.02 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 3.02 – – – – – – –
Dib et al. 2018 1.98 – – 1413 – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 2.05 1.89 – 6310 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.98 3.61 – 1413 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.98 3.61 – 1413 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2012 – – – – – 279 – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 2.65(1) 2.71 – 1259 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.80 4.42 – 1288 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️