Berkeley 4
(MWSC 73; OCL 307)
0.91
UTI
0.8
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
4.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.8 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 4 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption, age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a moderate percentage of members with 3 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Distant
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 11.299 | 64.391 | 0.305 | -2.402 | -0.309 | -60.436 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 11.291 | 64.391 | 0.296 | -2.421 | -0.236 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 11.273 | 64.389 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 11.299 | 64.39 | 0.306 | -2.409 | -0.298 | -63.639 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 11.284 | 64.392 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 11.293 | 64.397 | 0.306 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 11.299 | 64.39 | 0.306 | -2.409 | -0.298 | -63.639 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 11.277 | 64.389 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 11.257 | 64.379 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 11.273 | 64.389 | 0.291 | -2.427 | -0.233 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 11.291 | 64.391 | 0.296 | -2.421 | -0.236 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 11.291 | 64.391 | 0.296 | -2.421 | -0.236 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 11.254 | 64.385 | 0.284 | -2.421 | -0.269 | -53.13 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 11.291 | 64.391 | â | â | â | -53.13 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 11.282 | 64.393 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 11.291 | 64.391 | 0.296 | -2.421 | -0.236 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 11.25 | 64.385 | â | 1.112 | 1.163 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 11.257 | 64.379 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 11.254 | 64.385 | â | -3.21 | -1.3 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 11.268 | 64.382 | â | -0.23 | 1.01 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 11.268 | 64.382 | â | -0.23 | 0.47 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 11.351 | 64.394 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 11.351 | 64.394 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 11.37 | 64.4 | â | -1.29 | 0.12 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 11.35 | 64.4 | â | -2.31 | -0.12 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 11.254 | 64.385 | â | -3.21 | -1.3 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.15 | 0.29 | â | 7438 | -0.161 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.66 | 2.22 | â | 13 | â | 460 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 2171* | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 21 | â | 473 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 3.63 | 2.29 | â | 10 | 0.350 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.95 | 2.44 | 1.43 | 17 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.70 | 2.33 | â | 13 | -0.134 | 645* | 0.55 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 20 | â | 1104 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.66 | 2.22 | â | 13 | -0.103 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.12 | 2.16 | â | 21 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 3.08 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 2.74 | 2.02 | â | 15 | -1.112 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 3.08 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 3.08 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.38 | 0.61 | â | 50 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 3.30 | 2.17 | â | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 3.30 | 2.17 | â | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 3.30 | 2.17 | â | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 3.20 | 2.17 | â | 12 | â | 5636* | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 3.20 | 2.17 | â | 12 | â | 653 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 3.20 | 2.17 | â | 12 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.25 | 1.86 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.46 | 2.57 | â | 13 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.