Berkeley 37
(MWSC 1180; OCL 551; FSR 1119; FoF 1976)
0.91
UTI
0.79
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
2.8 [arcmin]
- CN 0.79 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 37 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, well above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Distant
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 110.074 | -0.998 | 0.184 | -1.063 | 0.71 | 77.945 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 110.075 | -1.002 | 0.197 | -1.113 | 0.682 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 110.075 | -1.004 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 110.079 | -1.004 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 110.069 | -0.998 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 110.069 | -0.998 | 0.183 | -1.052 | 0.712 | 81.747 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 110.075 | -1.003 | 0.182 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 110.069 | -0.998 | 0.183 | -1.052 | 0.712 | 81.747 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 110.079 | -1.004 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 110.07 | -0.992 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 110.079 | -1.004 | 0.212 | -1.127 | 0.682 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 110.075 | -1.002 | 0.197 | -1.113 | 0.682 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 110.075 | -1.002 | 0.197 | -1.113 | 0.682 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 110.073 | -1.012 | 0.287 | -1.045 | 0.551 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 110.075 | -1.002 | â | â | â | 76.4 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 110.077 | -1.0 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 110.075 | -1.002 | 0.197 | -1.113 | 0.682 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 110.07 | -1.044 | â | 6.244 | -4.653 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 110.07 | -0.992 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 110.1 | -1.1 | â | -2.44 | 5.44 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 110.077 | -0.994 | â | 6.88 | -4.6 | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 110.1 | -1.1 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 110.1 | -1.1 | â | -2.44 | 5.44 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 5.55 | 0.23 | â | 647 | 0.229 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.360* | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 4.22 | 0.30 | â | 1045 | â | 704 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.225* | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1435* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 3.18 | 0.57 | â | 1318 | -0.800 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 5.03 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 1019 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 4.40 | 0.29 | â | 991 | -0.222 | 598* | 0.52 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 631 | â | 577 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 4.22 | 0.30 | â | 1045 | -0.309 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 4.19 | 0.17 | â | 933 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 4.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 676 | 0.500 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 4.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 4.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 4.17 | 0.00 | â | 2399 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 4.82 | 0.84 | â | 631 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 4.82 | 0.84 | â | 631 | -0.380 | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 5.62 | â | â | 1585 | -0.380 | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 5.25 | 0.16 | â | 631 | -0.050 | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.