Berkeley 35
(FSR 1075; MWSC 1129; OCL 541; MWSC 1130)
0.84
UTI
0.81
CN
0.97
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.84
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Nm (P>50%)
259
Core radius and density
1.4 [pc], 4.9 [pc-2]
- CN 0.81 Rich
- Cdens 0.97 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.84 Well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 35 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 107.486 | 2.733 | 0.181 | -0.607 | -0.251 | 81.2 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 107.491 | 2.734 | 0.16 | -0.58 | -0.235 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 107.482 | 2.729 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 107.489 | 2.734 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 107.48 | 2.731 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 107.48 | 2.731 | 0.177 | -0.611 | -0.255 | 84.127 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 107.482 | 2.729 | 0.176 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 107.48 | 2.731 | 0.177 | -0.611 | -0.255 | 84.127 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 107.477 | 2.735 | â | â | â | â |
| Jadhav & Subramaniam | 2021 | 107.491 | 2.734 | â | â | â | â |
| Netopil et al. | 2022 | 107.491 | 2.733 | 0.17 | -0.564 | -0.24 | 101.46 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 107.489 | 2.734 | 0.162 | -0.587 | -0.235 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 107.491 | 2.734 | 0.16 | -0.58 | -0.235 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 107.491 | 2.734 | 0.16 | -0.58 | -0.235 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 107.491 | 2.734 | â | â | â | 101.46 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 107.482 | 2.736 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 107.491 | 2.734 | 0.16 | -0.58 | -0.235 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2018 | â | â | â | -0.1 | -0.54 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 107.49 | 2.734 | â | -7.384 | -0.022 | â |
| Sampedro et al. | 2017 | 107.483 | 2.734 | â | -1.58 | 3.76 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 107.477 | 2.735 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 107.483 | 2.734 | â | -3.29 | 3.34 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 107.484 | 2.733 | â | -7.78 | 2.28 | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2011 | 107.483 | 2.725 | â | â | â | â |
| Froebrich et al. | 2007 | 107.5 | 2.716 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 107.483 | 2.734 | â | -3.29 | 3.34 | â |
| Lynga | 1987 | 107.706 | 2.738 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 4.865 | 0.41 | 0.73 | 1130 | -0.206 | 994 | â | 2 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 4.97 | 0.40 | â | 1049 | -0.075 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.320(5) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 4.64 | 0.65 | â | 1130 | â | 264 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.206(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 5.95 | 0.23 | 0.73 | 827 | â | 1400(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 3.25 | 0.41 | â | 1905 | -0.390 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 5.95 | 0.23 | 0.73 | 828 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 1161 | â | 885 | â | â |
| Jadhav & Subramaniam | 2021 | 4.74 | 0.43 | â | 1175 | â | 994 | â | 2(1) |
| Netopil et al. | 2022 | 5.89(1) | 0.41 | â | 1000 | -0.130(1) | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 4.64 | 0.65 | â | 1130 | -0.301 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 4.74 | 0.43 | â | 1175 | â | â | â | â |
| Kounkel et al. | 2020 | 4.74 | 0.57 | â | 708 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 5.28 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 5.28 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 5.28 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.37 | 0.00 | â | 1380 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 5.01 | 0.00 | â | 1161 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 5.01 | 0.00 | â | 1161 | â | â | â | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2012 | â | â | â | â | â | 2942 | â | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2011 | 4.76(1) | 0.00 | â | 1000 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 4.39 | 1.48 | â | 891 | -0.130 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.98 (50th percentile).
Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.98 (50th percentile).
Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.0175, e_all=0.0544.