Berkeley 33
(MWSC 1033)
0.91
UTI
0.82
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
2.4 [arcmin]
- CN 0.82 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 33 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Very distant
Moderate extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Contains BSS
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 104.459 | -13.227 | 0.17 | -0.703 | 1.602 | 78.57 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 104.456 | -13.227 | 0.144 | -0.73 | 1.551 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 104.454 | -13.226 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 104.462 | -13.226 | 0.176 | -0.688 | 1.594 | 84.489 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 104.461 | -13.231 | 0.176 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 104.462 | -13.226 | 0.176 | -0.688 | 1.594 | 84.489 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 104.454 | -13.219 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 104.459 | -13.226 | 0.165 | -0.731 | 1.577 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 104.456 | -13.227 | 0.144 | -0.73 | 1.551 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 104.454 | -13.226 | 0.147 | -0.741 | 1.575 | 78.836 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 104.456 | -13.227 | 0.144 | -0.73 | 1.551 | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | 104.46 | -13.22 | â | -0.69 | 1.56 | 77.5 |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 104.456 | -13.227 | 0.144 | -0.73 | 1.551 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 104.456 | -13.227 | â | â | â | 78.82 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 104.456 | -13.227 | 0.144 | -0.73 | 1.551 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 104.46 | -13.216 | â | -0.392 | 0.271 | 76.6 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 104.454 | -13.219 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 104.425 | -13.217 | â | -1.35 | 4.29 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 104.46 | -13.22 | â | 0.23 | 1.82 | 76.6 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 104.425 | -13.217 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 104.425 | -13.217 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 104.425 | -13.217 | â | -1.36 | 4.36 | 76.6 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 4.82 | 1.81 | â | 745 | -0.327 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 4.38 | 2.06 | â | 305 | â | 1156 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 2028* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 4.23 | 2.03 | â | 295 | -0.160 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 4.93 | 1.49 | 1.40 | 481 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 1096 | â | 497 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 5.81* | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 5.79 | 1.12 | â | 794 | â | â | â | 1 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 4.38 | 2.06 | â | 305 | -0.195 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 5.86 | 1.75 | â | 234 | â | â | â | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | â | â | â | â | -0.300 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 5.79 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 5.79 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 5.79 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 10.96 | 1.92 | â | 195 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 4.79 | 0.97 | â | 1096 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 4.79 | 0.97 | â | 1096 | -0.260 | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 6.00 | â | â | 794 | -0.260 | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 4.63 | 2.17 | â | 708 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 6.00 | 1.12 | â | 794 | -0.260 | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.