Berkeley 32
(MWSC 1037; Biurakan 8; OCL 522; FoF 583)
0.95
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
4.6 [arcmin]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 32 is a very rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Distant
Low extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Old
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | β | 104.533 | 6.436 | 0.277 | -0.357 | -1.585 | 105.489 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 104.53 | 6.433 | 0.28 | -0.335 | -1.608 | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 104.533 | 6.437 | β | β | β | β |
| Carrasco-Varela et al. | 2025 | 104.738 | 6.379 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 104.528 | 6.43 | β | β | β | β |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 104.531 | 6.433 | β | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 104.531 | 6.433 | 0.275 | -0.356 | -1.59 | 103.041 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 104.533 | 6.437 | 0.275 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 104.531 | 6.433 | 0.275 | -0.356 | -1.59 | 103.041 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 104.521 | 6.437 | β | β | β | β |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 104.53 | 6.433 | 0.308 | -0.345 | -1.616 | β |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 104.53 | 6.433 | 0.28 | -0.335 | -1.608 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 104.528 | 6.43 | 0.282 | -0.346 | -1.62 | 106.417 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 104.53 | 6.433 | 0.28 | -0.335 | -1.608 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 104.525 | 6.433 | β | -0.264 | -1.65 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 104.53 | 6.433 | 0.28 | -0.335 | -1.608 | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 104.532 | 6.431 | 0.289 | -0.354 | -1.45 | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 104.53 | 6.433 | β | β | β | 106.4 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 104.529 | 6.438 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 104.53 | 6.433 | 0.28 | -0.335 | -1.608 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 104.52 | 6.434 | β | -0.088 | -0.698 | 101.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 104.521 | 6.437 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 104.525 | 6.433 | β | -1.41 | -0.86 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 104.527 | 6.435 | β | 0.55 | -2.32 | 101.0 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 104.525 | 6.433 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 104.52 | 6.43 | β | 0.05 | β | β |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 104.525 | 6.433 | β | β | β | β |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 104.52 | 6.433 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 104.525 | 6.433 | β | -1.41 | -0.86 | 105.2 |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 3.35 | 0.58 | β | 4764 | -0.360 | β | β | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | β | β | β | β | -0.200* | β | β | β |
| Carrasco-Varela et al. | 2025 | 3.32 | 0.55 | β | 4853 | -0.300 | β | β | 0.15* |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.32 | 0.55 | β | 4853 | β | 3138 | β | β |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | β | β | β | β | -0.324* | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | β | β | β | β | β | 3540* | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.75 | 0.49 | β | 5129 | -0.160 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.22 | 0.16 | 0.71 | 3251 | β | β | β | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | β | β | β | 2818 | β | 940 | β | β |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 3.24* | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 3.24 | 0.46 | β | 5012 | β | β | β | 27 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.32 | 0.55 | β | 4853 | -0.280 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.08 | 0.34 | β | 4898 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 3.24 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | β | β | β | 4170 | 0.250 | β | β | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 3.24 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 3.24 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.01 | 0.15 | β | 6310 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 5.00 | 0.07 | β | 2818 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 5.00 | 0.07 | β | 2818 | -0.290 | β | β | β |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 3.10 | β | β | 3388 | -0.290 | β | β | β |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 3.10 | 0.50 | β | 3388 | β | β | β | β |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 3.10 | 0.50 | β | 3380 | -0.580* | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 3.08 | 0.46 | β | 5012 | -0.290 | β | β | β |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Rain et al. (2024)
Most BSSs lie just above the turnoff, but others span a wide luminosity range, implying diverse binary histories. Both BSSs and YSSs are broadly matched by binary models, though a few faint candidates may be misclassified or require different model parameters.