Berkeley 32

(MWSC 1037; Biurakan 8; OCL 522; FoF 583)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.95 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 4.6 [arcmin]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Berkeley 32 is a very rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Distant Low extinction Massive Near-solar metallicity Old

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Rain et al. (2024)
Most BSSs lie just above the turnoff, but others span a wide luminosity range, implying diverse binary histories. Both BSSs and YSSs are broadly matched by binary models, though a few faint candidates may be misclassified or require different model parameters.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 104.533 6.436 0.277 -0.357 -1.585 105.489
Li et al. 2025 104.53 6.433 0.28 -0.335 -1.608 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 104.533 6.437 – – – –
Carrasco-Varela et al. 2025 104.738 6.379 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 104.528 6.43 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 104.531 6.433 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 104.531 6.433 0.275 -0.356 -1.59 103.041
Cavallo et al. 2024 104.533 6.437 0.275 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 104.531 6.433 0.275 -0.356 -1.59 103.041
Just et al. 2023 104.521 6.437 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 104.53 6.433 0.308 -0.345 -1.616 –
Rain et al. 2021 104.53 6.433 0.28 -0.335 -1.608 –
Dias et al. 2021 104.528 6.43 0.282 -0.346 -1.62 106.417
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 104.53 6.433 0.28 -0.335 -1.608 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 104.525 6.433 – -0.264 -1.65 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 104.53 6.433 0.28 -0.335 -1.608 –
Liu & Pang 2019 104.532 6.431 0.289 -0.354 -1.45 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 104.53 6.433 – – – 106.4
Bica et al. 2019 104.529 6.438 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 104.53 6.433 0.28 -0.335 -1.608 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 104.52 6.434 – -0.088 -0.698 101.0
Kharchenko et al. 2016 104.521 6.437 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 104.525 6.433 – -1.41 -0.86 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 104.527 6.435 – 0.55 -2.32 101.0
Gozha et al. 2012 104.525 6.433 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 104.52 6.43 – 0.05 – –
van den Bergh 2006 104.525 6.433 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 104.52 6.433 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 104.525 6.433 – -1.41 -0.86 105.2

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 3.35 0.58 – 4764 -0.360 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.200* – – –
Carrasco-Varela et al. 2025 3.32 0.55 – 4853 -0.300 – – 0.15*
Almeida et al. 2025 3.32 0.55 – 4853 – 3138 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.324* – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 3540* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.75 0.49 – 5129 -0.160 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 3.22 0.16 0.71 3251 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 2818 – 940 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 3.24* – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 3.24 0.46 – 5012 – – – 27
Dias et al. 2021 3.32 0.55 – 4853 -0.280 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 3.08 0.34 – 4898 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 3.24 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 4170 0.250 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 3.24 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 3.24 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 3.01 0.15 – 6310 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 5.00 0.07 – 2818 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 5.00 0.07 – 2818 -0.290 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 3.10 – – 3388 -0.290 – – –
van den Bergh 2006 3.10 0.50 – 3388 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 3.10 0.50 – 3380 -0.580* – – –
Dias et al. 2002 3.08 0.46 – 5012 -0.290 – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️