Berkeley 104

(MWSC 8; OCL 282)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.89 UTI
0.72
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 2.5 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.72 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Berkeley 104 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Distant Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age Contains BSS

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 0.87 63.589 0.211 -2.381 0.046 -70.137
Hu & Soubiran 2025 0.887 63.594 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.868 63.587 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 0.858 63.59 0.211 -2.379 0.043 -74.005
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.887 63.594 0.212 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.858 63.59 0.211 -2.379 0.043 -74.005
Just et al. 2023 0.843 63.577 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 0.869 63.595 0.226 -2.404 0.073 –
Rain et al. 2021 0.865 63.587 0.198 -2.392 0.09 –
Dias et al. 2021 0.868 63.587 0.197 -2.394 0.096 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.865 63.587 0.198 -2.392 0.09 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 0.875 63.583 – -2.449 0.129 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.865 63.587 0.198 -2.392 0.09 –
Bica et al. 2019 0.873 63.587 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.865 63.587 0.198 -2.392 0.09 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 0.87 63.583 – -1.696 -4.194 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 0.843 63.577 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 0.875 63.583 – -2.35 -0.3 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 0.852 63.58 – -4.57 -4.37 –
Gozha et al. 2012 0.875 63.584 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 0.852 63.58 – -4.54 -4.42 –
Chen et al. 2003 0.869 63.597 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 0.875 63.583 – -2.35 -0.3 –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.270* – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 4.04 1.85 – 1052 – 470 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 715* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 3.18 1.89 – 891 -0.090 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 4.27 1.69 1.55 573 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 638 – 723 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 4.45* – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 4.41 1.40 – 776 – – – 1
Dias et al. 2021 4.04 1.85 – 1052 -0.294 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 4.33 1.36 – 776 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 4.41 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 4.41 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 3.17 1.31 – 1122 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 3.60 1.88 – 638 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 3.60 1.88 – 638 0.070 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 4.37 – – 776 0.070 – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 3.60 1.88 – 708 0.070 – – –
Chen et al. 2003 4.37 1.40 – 790 0.070* – – –
Dias et al. 2002 4.37 1.40 – 776 0.070 – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️