Berkeley 104
(MWSC 8; OCL 282)
0.89
UTI
0.72
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
2.5 [arcmin]
- CN 0.72 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 104 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Distant
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Contains BSS
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | β | 0.87 | 63.589 | 0.211 | -2.381 | 0.046 | -70.137 |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 0.887 | 63.594 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.868 | 63.587 | β | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 0.858 | 63.59 | 0.211 | -2.379 | 0.043 | -74.005 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.887 | 63.594 | 0.212 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.858 | 63.59 | 0.211 | -2.379 | 0.043 | -74.005 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 0.843 | 63.577 | β | β | β | β |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 0.869 | 63.595 | 0.226 | -2.404 | 0.073 | β |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 0.865 | 63.587 | 0.198 | -2.392 | 0.09 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.868 | 63.587 | 0.197 | -2.394 | 0.096 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.865 | 63.587 | 0.198 | -2.392 | 0.09 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 0.875 | 63.583 | β | -2.449 | 0.129 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.865 | 63.587 | 0.198 | -2.392 | 0.09 | β |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 0.873 | 63.587 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.865 | 63.587 | 0.198 | -2.392 | 0.09 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.87 | 63.583 | β | -1.696 | -4.194 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.843 | 63.577 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 0.875 | 63.583 | β | -2.35 | -0.3 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.852 | 63.58 | β | -4.57 | -4.37 | β |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.875 | 63.584 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 0.852 | 63.58 | β | -4.54 | -4.42 | β |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 0.869 | 63.597 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.875 | 63.583 | β | -2.35 | -0.3 | β |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | β | β | β | β | -0.270* | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 4.04 | 1.85 | β | 1052 | β | 470 | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | β | β | β | β | β | 715* | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 3.18 | 1.89 | β | 891 | -0.090 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 4.27 | 1.69 | 1.55 | 573 | β | β | β | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | β | β | β | 638 | β | 723 | β | β |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 4.45* | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 4.41 | 1.40 | β | 776 | β | β | β | 1 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 4.04 | 1.85 | β | 1052 | -0.294 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 4.33 | 1.36 | β | 776 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 4.41 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 4.41 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.17 | 1.31 | β | 1122 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 3.60 | 1.88 | β | 638 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 3.60 | 1.88 | β | 638 | 0.070 | β | β | β |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 4.37 | β | β | 776 | 0.070 | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 3.60 | 1.88 | β | 708 | 0.070 | β | β | β |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 4.37 | 1.40 | β | 790 | 0.070* | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 4.37 | 1.40 | β | 776 | 0.070 | β | β | β |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.