Berkeley 10
(FSR 0623; MWSC 290; OCL 370; FoF 630)
0.97
UTI
0.84
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
27.9 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.84 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Berkeley 10 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 54.895 | 66.484 | 0.387 | -1.497 | 1.01 | -36.462 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 54.894 | 66.486 | 0.372 | -1.47 | 1.047 | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 54.888 | 66.49 | β | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 54.885 | 66.489 | 0.398 | -1.497 | 1.005 | -32.448 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 54.895 | 66.488 | 0.396 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 54.885 | 66.489 | 0.398 | -1.497 | 1.005 | -32.448 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 54.899 | 66.481 | β | β | β | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 54.886 | 66.488 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 54.888 | 66.49 | 0.368 | -1.464 | 1.053 | -36.134 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 54.894 | 66.486 | 0.372 | -1.47 | 1.047 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 54.883 | 66.486 | β | -1.545 | 1.057 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 54.894 | 66.486 | 0.372 | -1.47 | 1.047 | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 54.89 | 66.486 | 0.368 | -1.426 | 1.036 | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 54.894 | 66.486 | β | β | β | -36.29 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 54.874 | 66.49 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 54.894 | 66.486 | 0.372 | -1.47 | 1.047 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 54.885 | 66.486 | β | -2.837 | -2.97 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 54.886 | 66.488 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 54.883 | 66.486 | β | -2.11 | -0.5 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 54.9 | 66.49 | β | -1.72 | -1.22 | β |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 54.883 | 66.486 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 54.9 | 66.49 | β | -1.93 | -0.96 | β |
| Froebrich et al. | 2007 | 54.925 | 66.495 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 54.883 | 66.486 | β | -2.11 | -0.5 | β |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 2.2 | 2.54 | 1.2 | 692 | -0.116 | 1019 | 0.66 | β |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.15 | 2.37 | β | 1047 | 0.039 | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.00 | 2.60 | β | 798 | β | 1156 | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | β | β | β | β | β | 2288(1) | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.50 | 3.14 | β | 355 | 0.040 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.36 | 2.80 | 1.20 | 340 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.09 | 2.65 | β | 785 | -0.116 | 882(1) | 0.66 | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | β | β | β | 646 | β | 542 | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.00 | 2.60 | β | 798 | -0.100 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.37 | 1.94 | β | 1202 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.50 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | β | β | β | 692 | 0.500 | β | β | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.50 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.50 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.54 | 2.61 | β | 468 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.20 | 2.48 | β | 646 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.20 | 2.48 | β | 646 | -0.490 | β | β | β |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.70 | β | β | 1148 | -0.490 | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 2.20 | 2.48 | β | 668 | -0.490 | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.70 | 2.33 | β | 1148 | -0.490 | β | β | β |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.