Basel 5

(MWSC 2727; OCL 1038; ESO 455 56)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.27 UTI
0.0
CN
0.03
Cdens
0.5
CC3
0.42
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 3.4 [pc], 0.1 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.0 Sparse
  • Cdens 0.03 Very loose
  • CC3 0.5 Intermediate quality
  • Clit 0.42 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Basel 5 is a sparse, very loose object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as an intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~4.54 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~0.85 kpc).

Cantat-Gaudin & Anders (2020)
Likely an asterism caused by patchy extinction in a dense field; Gaia DR2 astrometry is too dispersed for a real cluster. More details in Appendix A of the article.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 268.181 -30.062 0.22 -2.76 -5.472 –
Just et al. 2023 268.116 -30.105 – – – –
Bica et al. 2019 268.127 -30.092 – – – –
Dias et al. 2018 – – – 0.28 -2.33 –
Sampedro et al. 2017 268.113 -30.1 – 0.35 -1.94 –
Joshi et al. 2016 268.125 -30.105 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 268.116 -30.105 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 268.112 -30.1 – -0.09 -1.74 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 268.125 -30.105 – 3.37 2.0 –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 268.125 -30.093 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 268.096 -30.099 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 268.1 -30.1 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 268.11 -30.1 – 3.17 1.76 –
Dias et al. 2002 268.113 -30.1 – -0.15 -1.72 –
Lynga 1987 268.056 -30.079 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 0.85 1.04 – 708 – 98 – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 708 – 65 – –
Joshi et al. 2016 0.99 1.09 – 708 – 98 – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 0.99 1.09 – 708 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 0.99 1.09 – 708 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2012 – – – – – 5842 – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 1.10(1) 5.65 – 1585 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.77 1.01 – 347 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 0.77 1.01 – 741 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.77 1.01 – 347 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 0.77 1.01 – 741 – – – –
Lynga 1987 0.85 1.04 – 1259 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸