Basel 14

(MWSC 3498)

0.20 UTI

0.0

C_N

0.09

C_dens

0.25

C_C3

0.34

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 20

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 0.5 [N/pc²]

C3 classification CC

C_N 0.0 Sparse
C_dens 0.09 Very loose
C_C3 0.25 Low quality
C_lit 0.34 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Basel 14 is a sparse, very loose object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate^* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as an intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~4.87 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.03 kpc).

⚠️ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (C_dup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Intermediate age

Data

🔍 Search references for Basel 14 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	320.269	44.786	0.205	-3.81	-3.269	-43.917
Just et al.	2023	320.252	44.822	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	320.25	44.821	–	-2.13	-1.917	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	320.252	44.822	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	320.325	44.817	–	-1.11	-0.05	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	320.257	44.825	–	-3.81	-3.5	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	320.296	44.854	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	320.325	44.817	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	320.325	44.817	–	-1.85	0.81	–
Lynga	1987	320.315	44.811	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.03	2.05	–	638	–	80	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	638	–	80	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	1.75	0.97	–	955	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	1.80	2.17	–	638	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	1.80	2.17	–	638	–	–	–	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2012	–	–	–	–	–	81	–	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	0.97⁽¹⁾	1.01	–	251	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	0.96	2.05	–	200	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	0.96	2.05	–	200	–	–	–	–
Lynga	1987	1.03	1.96	–	–	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️