ASCC 88
(MWSC 2536; FoF 2334)
0.90
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
12.9 [arcmin]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
ASCC 88 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Close
Moderate extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 256.866 | -35.579 | 1.102 | 0.915 | -3.285 | -17.735 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 256.886 | -35.564 | 1.097 | 0.919 | -3.282 | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 256.585 | -35.508 | 0.906 | 1.245 | -2.276 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 256.885 | -35.521 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 256.888 | -35.584 | 1.066 | 0.898 | -3.282 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 256.851 | -35.556 | 1.103 | 0.911 | -3.285 | -17.815 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 256.871 | -35.57 | 1.106 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 256.851 | -35.556 | 1.103 | 0.911 | -3.285 | -17.815 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 256.7 | -35.58 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 256.844 | -35.572 | 1.107 | 0.899 | -3.282 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 256.857 | -35.601 | 1.107 | 0.914 | -3.28 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 256.885 | -35.521 | 1.102 | 0.926 | -3.283 | -22.75 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 256.886 | -35.564 | 1.097 | 0.919 | -3.282 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 256.886 | -35.564 | 1.097 | 0.919 | -3.282 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 256.891 | -35.542 | 1.076 | 0.834 | -3.225 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 256.696 | -35.6 | 0.89 | 1.254 | -2.256 | -3.904 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 256.886 | -35.564 | â | â | â | -29.53 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 256.886 | -35.564 | 1.097 | 0.919 | -3.282 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 256.7 | -35.58 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 256.696 | -35.6 | â | -5.01 | -0.5 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 256.71 | -35.58 | â | 2.9 | -2.6 | 1.8 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 256.696 | -35.6 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 256.685 | -35.604 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 256.69 | -35.6 | â | 0.55 | â | 1.75 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 256.685 | -35.604 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 256.69 | -35.6 | â | 2.89 | -2.0 | 1.75 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 256.696 | -35.6 | â | -5.01 | -0.5 | 2.84 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.96 | 2.21 | â | 38 | 0.073 | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 0.91 | 1.74 | â | 100 | 0.000 | 981 | 0.52 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.86 | 1.85 | â | 345 | â | 224 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.93 | 1.45 | â | 458 | 0.100 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 376* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.90 | 2.20 | â | 91 | 0.020 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.85 | 1.88 | 0.63 | 121 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 10 | â | 2541 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 2.35 | â | 63 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.91 | â | â | 269 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.86 | 1.85 | â | 345 | 0.100 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.93 | 1.45 | â | 245 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.89 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 550 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 0.99 | 1.33 | â | 14 | -0.419 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.89 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.89 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.30 | 2.26 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.30 | 2.26 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.90 | â | â | 15 | â | 50119 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.90 | 1.55 | â | 15 | â | 62806* | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 1.90 | 1.55 | â | 15 | â | 12794 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.90 | 1.55 | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.90 | 1.55 | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.