ASCC 88

(MWSC 2536; FoF 2334)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.90 UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 12.9 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.76 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
ASCC 88 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Close Moderate extinction Massive Near-solar metallicity Young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 256.866 -35.579 1.102 0.915 -3.285 -17.735
Li et al. 2025 256.886 -35.564 1.097 0.919 -3.282 –
Wei et al. 2025 256.585 -35.508 0.906 1.245 -2.276 –
Almeida et al. 2025 256.885 -35.521 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 256.888 -35.584 1.066 0.898 -3.282 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 256.851 -35.556 1.103 0.911 -3.285 -17.815
Cavallo et al. 2024 256.871 -35.57 1.106 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 256.851 -35.556 1.103 0.911 -3.285 -17.815
Just et al. 2023 256.7 -35.58 – – – –
He et al. 2022 256.844 -35.572 1.107 0.899 -3.282 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 256.857 -35.601 1.107 0.914 -3.28 –
Dias et al. 2021 256.885 -35.521 1.102 0.926 -3.283 -22.75
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 256.886 -35.564 1.097 0.919 -3.282 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 256.886 -35.564 1.097 0.919 -3.282 –
Liu & Pang 2019 256.891 -35.542 1.076 0.834 -3.225 –
Dias et al. 2019 256.696 -35.6 0.89 1.254 -2.256 -3.904
Soubiran et al. 2018 256.886 -35.564 – – – -29.53
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 256.886 -35.564 1.097 0.919 -3.282 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 256.7 -35.58 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 256.696 -35.6 – -5.01 -0.5 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 256.71 -35.58 – 2.9 -2.6 1.8
Gozha et al. 2012 256.696 -35.6 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 256.685 -35.604 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 256.69 -35.6 – 0.55 – 1.75
Piskunov et al. 2007 256.685 -35.604 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 256.69 -35.6 – 2.89 -2.0 1.75
Dias et al. 2002 256.696 -35.6 – -5.01 -0.5 2.84

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.96 2.21 – 38 0.073 – – –
Wei et al. 2025 0.91 1.74 – 100 0.000 981 0.52 –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.86 1.85 – 345 – 224 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.93 1.45 – 458 0.100 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 376* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.90 2.20 – 91 0.020 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.85 1.88 0.63 121 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 10 – 2541 – –
He et al. 2022 – 2.35 – 63 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.91 – – 269 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.86 1.85 – 345 0.100 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.93 1.45 – 245 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.89 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 550 0.250 – – –
Dias et al. 2019 0.99 1.33 – 14 -0.419 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 0.89 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.89 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.30 2.26 – 10 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.30 2.26 – 10 – – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 1.90 – – 15 – 50119 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 1.90 1.55 – 15 – 62806* – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 1.90 1.55 – 15 – 12794 – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 1.90 1.55 – 15 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.90 1.55 – 15 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸