ASCC 85
(MWSC 2465)
0.88
UTI
0.66
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
13.2 [arcmin]
- CN 0.66 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
ASCC 85 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 251.823 | -45.562 | 1.139 | 0.155 | -4.123 | 7.853 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 251.853 | -45.555 | 1.119 | 0.17 | -4.102 | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 251.767 | -45.608 | 1.146 | 0.153 | -4.147 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 251.822 | -45.541 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 251.874 | -45.544 | 1.099 | 0.169 | -4.122 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 251.924 | -45.572 | 1.137 | 0.163 | -4.108 | 8.013 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 252.009 | -45.388 | 1.135 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 251.924 | -45.572 | 1.137 | 0.163 | -4.108 | 8.013 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 251.697 | -45.519 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 251.944 | -45.49 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 251.784 | -45.574 | 1.138 | 0.157 | -4.117 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 251.733 | -45.6 | 1.139 | 0.152 | -4.108 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 251.822 | -45.541 | 1.125 | 0.179 | -4.098 | 19.977 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 251.853 | -45.555 | 1.119 | 0.17 | -4.102 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 251.853 | -45.555 | 1.119 | 0.17 | -4.102 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 251.853 | -45.555 | â | â | â | 16.48 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 251.879 | -45.458 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 251.853 | -45.555 | 1.119 | 0.17 | -4.102 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 251.944 | -45.49 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 251.879 | -45.46 | â | -1.17 | -3.01 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 251.955 | -45.49 | â | -1.31 | -3.93 | 7.1 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 251.879 | -45.46 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 251.87 | -45.466 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 251.88 | -45.46 | â | 0.22 | â | 7.09 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 251.88 | -45.46 | â | -0.43 | -4.01 | 7.09 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 251.879 | -45.46 | â | -0.43 | -4.01 | 7.09 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.93 | 0.56 | â | 173 | 0.349 | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 1.03 | 0.95 | â | 68 | -0.250 | 400 | 0.35 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.85 | 0.73 | â | 138 | â | 311 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.83 | 0.56 | â | 92 | 0.096 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 531* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.78 | 0.71 | â | 182 | 0.150 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.83 | 0.52 | 0.65 | 124 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.85 | 0.75 | â | 185 | 0.056 | 383* | 0.45 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 32 | â | 65 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.90 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.81 | â | â | 78 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.85 | 0.73 | â | 138 | 0.097 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.83 | 0.56 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.87 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.87 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.87 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.81 | 1.62 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.81 | 1.62 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.20 | â | â | 26 | â | 562 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.20 | 0.62 | â | 26 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.20 | 0.62 | â | 26 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.20 | 0.62 | â | 26 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.