ASCC 80

(MWSC 2290)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.25 UTI
0.0
CN
0.0
Cdens
0.62
CC3
0.32
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 12 [pc], 0.02 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.0 Sparse
  • Cdens 0.0 Very loose
  • CC3 0.62 Intermediate quality
  • Clit 0.32 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
ASCC 80 is a sparse, very loose object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature, with no articles listed in the last 7 years.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~7.86 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.39 kpc).

âš ī¸ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (Cdup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 231.212 -60.128 0.127 -4.917 -3.005 -8.185
Bica et al. 2019 231.143 -60.14 – – – –
Dib et al. 2018 231.187 -60.128 – – – –
Sampedro et al. 2017 231.15 -60.14 – -5.51 -3.26 –
Joshi et al. 2016 231.187 -60.128 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 231.174 -60.126 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 231.15 -60.14 – -5.45 -3.32 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 231.187 -60.128 – -3.33 -5.03 -25.0
Gozha et al. 2012 231.15 -60.14 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 231.143 -60.14 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 231.15 -60.14 – 0.25 – -25.0
Kharchenko et al. 2005 231.15 -60.14 – -2.6 -4.15 -25.0
Dias et al. 2002 231.15 -60.14 – -5.45 -3.32 -25.0

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.39 0.895 – 161 – 2042 – –
Dib et al. 2018 1.28 – – 237 – – – –
Joshi et al. 2016 1.28 1.25 – 237 – 2042 – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.28 1.25 – 237 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.28 1.25 – 237 – – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 1.50 – – 85 – 2042 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 1.50 0.54 – 85 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 1.50 0.54 – 85 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.50 0.54 – 85 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸