ASCC 71
(MWSC 2016)
0.90
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
11.4 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
ASCC 71 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 185.058 | -67.524 | 0.78 | -9.37 | -1.377 | -11.806 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 185.033 | -67.509 | 0.786 | -9.272 | -1.351 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 184.979 | -67.48 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 185.169 | -67.521 | 0.782 | -9.358 | -1.361 | -14.301 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 185.087 | -67.509 | 0.784 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 185.169 | -67.521 | 0.782 | -9.358 | -1.361 | -14.301 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 185.038 | -67.461 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 185.179 | -67.526 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 185.062 | -67.488 | 0.771 | -9.369 | -1.326 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 184.979 | -67.48 | 0.795 | -9.265 | -1.341 | -11.371 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 185.033 | -67.509 | 0.786 | -9.272 | -1.351 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 185.033 | -67.509 | 0.786 | -9.272 | -1.351 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 185.033 | -67.509 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 185.033 | -67.509 | â | â | â | -11.43 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 185.174 | -67.516 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 185.033 | -67.509 | 0.786 | -9.272 | -1.351 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 185.179 | -67.526 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 185.175 | -67.52 | â | -4.41 | 1.68 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 185.19 | -67.53 | â | -9.2 | 0.82 | -17.9 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 185.175 | -67.52 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 185.174 | -67.516 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 185.17 | -67.52 | â | 0.41 | â | -17.9 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 185.17 | -67.52 | â | -7.73 | -0.3 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 185.175 | -67.52 | â | -7.73 | -0.3 | -17.9 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.23 | 0.81 | 0.57 | 115 | -0.020 | 318 | 0.5 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.18 | 0.83 | â | 126 | -0.049 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.19 | 0.92 | â | 121 | â | 270 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 318(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.20 | 0.81 | â | 186 | -0.020 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.21 | 0.75 | 0.57 | 211 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.24 | 1.00 | â | 118 | -0.069 | 432(1) | 0.50 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 100 | â | 246 | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 1.23 | â | â | 135 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.19 | 0.92 | â | 121 | 0.063 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.27 | 0.53 | â | 129 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.23 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 1.29 | 0.73 | â | 112 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.23 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.23 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.21 | 0.84 | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.21 | 0.84 | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.30 | â | â | 76 | â | 6761 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.30 | 0.78 | â | 76 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.30 | 0.78 | â | 76 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.30 | 0.78 | â | 76 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.