ASCC 70

(MWSC 2010; Alessi 38)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.23 UTI
0.41
CN
0.03
Cdens
0.12
CC3
0.29
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 5.0 [pc], 0.1 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.41 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 0.03 Very loose
  • CC3 0.12 Very low quality
  • Clit 0.29 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
ASCC 70 is a poorly populated, very loose object of very low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as an extremely massive, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~4.99 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~2.70 kpc).

âš ī¸ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (Cdup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Bica et al. (2019)
List of clusters and alike reported by B. Alessi.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 183.722 -64.451 0.201 -7.863 1.097 -13.877
Just et al. 2023 183.696 -64.396 – – – –
Bica et al. 2019 183.748 -64.424 – – – –
Sampedro et al. 2017 183.75 -64.43 – -5.1 1.45 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 183.696 -64.396 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 183.75 -64.43 – -4.99 1.2 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 183.705 -64.4 – -6.0 0.31 -7.8
Gozha et al. 2012 183.75 -64.43 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 183.748 -64.424 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 183.75 -64.43 – 0.3 – -7.75
Kharchenko et al. 2005 183.75 -64.43 – -5.55 -0.32 -7.75
Dias et al. 2002 183.75 -64.43 – -4.99 1.2 -10.44

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.7 1.1 – 8 – 20140 – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 8 – 3126 – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.65 1.48 – 8 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.65 1.48 – 8 – – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 2.70 – – 8 – 37154 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 2.70 1.10 – 8 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 2.70 1.10 – 8 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.70 1.10 – 8 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸