ASCC 34

(MWSC 1134)

0.14 UTI

0.0

C_N

0.01

C_dens

0.12

C_C3

0.29

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 19

Core radius and density 6.8 [pc], 0.04 [pc^-2]

C3 classification DC

C_N 0.0 Sparse
C_dens 0.01 Very loose
C_C3 0.12 Very low quality
C_lit 0.29 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

ASCC 34 is a sparse, very loose object of very low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate^* distance, well above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as an intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~4.86 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~0.52 kpc).

⚠️ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (C_dup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Close Low extinction Intermediate age

Data

🔍 Search references for ASCC 34 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	107.61	6.071	0.206	-0.885	-0.134	59.401
Just et al.	2023	107.648	6.082	–	–	–	–
Bica et al.	2019	107.622	6.071	–	–	–	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	107.625	6.07	–	-3.61	-0.67	–
Joshi et al.	2016	107.655	6.08	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	107.648	6.082	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	107.625	6.07	–	-3.16	-0.8	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	107.655	6.08	–	-2.06	-0.36	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	107.622	6.071	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	107.62	6.07	–	-2.36	-1.87	–
Dias et al.	2002	107.625	6.07	–	-2.36	-1.87	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	0.515	0.1	–	339	–	56	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	339	–	6	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	0.48	0.07	–	339	–	105	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	0.48	0.07	–	339	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	0.48	0.07	–	339	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	0.55	0.13	–	355	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	0.55	0.13	–	355	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	0.55	0.13	–	355	–	–	–	–

Visualization

ℹ️