ASCC 29

(MWSC 1013)

0.88 UTI

0.64

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 79

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 8.8 [N/pc²]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.64 Moderately populated
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

ASCC 29 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for ASCC 29 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	103.549	-1.668	0.963	-0.987	-1.027	17.232
Li et al.	2025	103.571	-1.67	0.944	-1.008	-1.019	–
Almeida et al.	2025	103.565	-1.651	–	–	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	103.59	-1.669	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	103.59	-1.669	0.971	-0.994	-1.051	12.109
Cavallo et al.	2024	103.554	-1.676	0.968	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	103.59	-1.669	0.971	-0.994	-1.051	12.109
Almeida et al.	2023	103.556	-1.649	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	103.575	-1.688	–	–	–	–
He et al.	2022	103.57	-1.667	0.965	-0.983	-1.035	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	103.534	-1.675	0.978	-0.971	-1.028	–
Dias et al.	2021	103.565	-1.651	0.954	-1.001	-1.015	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	103.571	-1.67	0.944	-1.008	-1.019	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	103.571	-1.67	0.944	-1.008	-1.019	–
Bossini et al.	2019	103.571	-1.67	–	–	–	–
Bica et al.	2019	103.573	-1.655	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	103.571	-1.67	0.944	-1.008	-1.019	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	103.575	-1.688	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	103.575	-1.65	–	2.06	-3.38	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	103.582	-1.69	–	-0.18	0.07	13.5
Gozha et al.	2012	103.575	-1.65	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	103.568	-1.646	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2007	103.57	-1.65	–	0.22	–	13.5
Kharchenko et al.	2005	103.57	-1.65	–	-0.49	-0.35	13.5
Dias et al.	2002	103.575	-1.65	–	2.06	-3.38	13.5

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	0.99	0.215	0.4	115	-0.086	132	0.42	–
Li et al.	2025	0.99	0.32	–	70	-0.126	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.01	0.40	–	78	–	132	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	–	–	–	–	-0.268⁽¹⁾	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	241⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.03	0.30	–	66	0.040	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	0.97	0.11	0.40	120	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	0.99	0.24	–	135	-0.077	183⁽¹⁾	0.42	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	115	–	31	–	–
He et al.	2022	–	0.40	–	71	–	–	–	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	1.03	–	–	98	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	1.01	0.40	–	78	-0.096	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	1.06	0.19	–	93	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.03	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Bossini et al.	2019	1.02	0.24	–	89	0.000	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.03	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	0.83	0.16	–	115	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	0.83	0.16	–	115	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	0.75	–	–	115	–	100	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	0.75	0.16	–	115	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	0.75	0.16	–	115	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	0.75	0.16	–	115	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3