ASCC 19
(MWSC 547; FoF 2372; OCSN 128)
0.96
UTI
0.82
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
22.8 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.82 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
ASCC 19 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 82.052 | -1.959 | 2.797 | 1.148 | -1.218 | 19.284 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 81.982 | -1.987 | 2.768 | 1.152 | -1.234 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 82.004 | -1.962 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 81.988 | -1.94 | 2.769 | 1.169 | -1.185 | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 81.978 | -1.856 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 81.978 | -1.856 | 2.805 | 1.168 | -1.182 | 11.651 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 81.982 | -1.987 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 81.966 | -1.89 | 2.806 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 81.978 | -1.856 | 2.805 | 1.168 | -1.182 | 11.651 |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 81.95 | -1.92 | 2.79 | 1.2 | -1.24 | 20.41 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 81.915 | -1.964 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 82.982 | -3.059 | 2.781 | 1.521 | -1.244 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 82.004 | -1.962 | 2.756 | 1.112 | -1.303 | 23.576 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 81.982 | -1.987 | 2.768 | 1.152 | -1.234 | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | 81.922 | -1.965 | â | 1.24 | -1.14 | 23.0 |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 81.982 | -1.987 | 2.768 | 1.152 | -1.234 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 82.222 | -1.971 | 2.768 | 1.193 | -1.138 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 81.983 | -1.987 | 2.768 | 1.152 | -1.234 | 23.574 |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 81.982 | -1.987 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 81.982 | -1.987 | â | â | â | 23.89 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 81.982 | -1.987 | 2.768 | 1.152 | -1.234 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 81.915 | -1.964 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 81.946 | -1.98 | â | 1.43 | -1.0 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 81.922 | -1.965 | â | 0.28 | -0.59 | 19.8 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 81.946 | -1.98 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 81.939 | -1.974 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 81.94 | -1.98 | â | 0.8 | â | 19.8 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 81.939 | -1.974 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 81.94 | -1.98 | â | 0.61 | -0.68 | 19.3 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.35 | 0.16 | 0.52 | 14 | 0.000 | 162 | â | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.30 | 0.15 | â | 13 | -0.141 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.36 | 0.19 | â | 14 | â | 162 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.35 | 0.13 | â | 11 | 0.076 | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.015(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 56(1) | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 10 | â | 181 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.35 | 0.56 | â | 5 | 0.140 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.34 | 0.23 | 0.52 | 7 | â | â | â | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 0.40 | 0.28 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 32 | â | 16 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.20 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.36 | 0.19 | â | 14 | 0.076 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.35 | 0.13 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | â | â | â | â | -0.050 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.36 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 11 | -0.250 | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 0.35 | 0.22 | â | 14 | 0.323 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.31 | 0.06 | â | 12 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.36 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.36 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.31 | 0.16 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.31 | 0.16 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.35 | â | â | 44 | â | 372 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.35 | 0.03 | â | 44 | â | 214(1) | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.35 | 0.03 | â | 44 | â | 87 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.35 | 0.03 | â | 44 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.