ASCC 120

(MWSC 3631)

0.16 UTI

0.0

C_N

0.01

C_dens

0.0

C_C3

0.39

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 14

Core radius and density 2.5 [pc], 0.05 [pc^-2]

C3 classification DD

C_N 0.0 Sparse
C_dens 0.01 Very loose
C_C3 0.0 Very low quality
C_lit 0.39 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

ASCC 120 is a sparse, very loose object of very low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate^* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as an extremely massive, young cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~4.21 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.50 kpc).

Relatively close Moderate extinction Extremely massive Young

Data

🔍 Search references for ASCC 120 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	337.631	57.226	0.238	-0.756	-1.966	–
Just et al.	2023	337.561	57.191	–	–	–	–
Bica et al.	2019	344.055	50.158	–	–	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	337.567	57.195	–	–	–	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	337.65	57.21	–	-0.01	-0.54	–
Joshi et al.	2016	337.567	57.195	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	337.561	57.191	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	337.65	57.21	–	-0.65	-1.97	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	337.567	57.195	–	-2.58	-2.25	-60.8
Gozha et al.	2012	337.65	57.21	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	337.567	57.195	–	-2.58	-2.25	-60.8
Piskunov et al.	2008	337.64	57.207	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2007	337.65	57.21	–	0.3	–	-60.8
Kharchenko et al.	2005	337.65	57.21	–	-2.99	-1.54	-60.79
Dias et al.	2002	337.65	57.21	–	-0.65	-1.97	-60.8

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.5	2.08	–	25	–	13804	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	25	–	255	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	1.50	–	–	25	–	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	1.50	2.08	–	25	–	13804	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	1.50	2.08	–	25	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	1.50	2.08	–	25	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	2.50	–	–	12	–	13804	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	1.50	2.08	–	25	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	2.50	1.96	–	12	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	2.50	1.96	–	12	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	2.50	1.96	–	12	–	–	–	–

Visualization

ℹ️