ASCC 110

(MWSC 3234)

0.83 UTI

0.52

C_N

0.9

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

C3 classification AB

Number of members (P>50%) 54

Radius (P>50% members) 6.0 [arcmin]

C_N 0.52 Moderately populated
C_dens 0.9 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

ASCC 110 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Relatively close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for ASCC 110 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	–	300.716	33.522	0.504	0.287	-3.165	-2.15
Li et al.	2025	300.742	33.528	0.497	0.271	-3.132	–
Almeida et al.	2025	300.772	33.549	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	300.725	33.527	0.49	0.298	-3.159	-5.627
Cavallo et al.	2024	300.735	33.502	0.502	–	–	–
He et al.	2023	300.577	33.736	0.726	-0.792	-2.556	-24.91
Hunt & Reffert	2023	300.725	33.527	0.49	0.298	-3.159	-5.627
Just et al.	2023	300.73	33.567	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	300.772	33.549	0.495	0.278	-3.134	-1.178
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	300.742	33.528	0.497	0.271	-3.132	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	300.742	33.528	0.497	0.271	-3.132	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	300.742	33.528	–	–	–	-1.09
Bica et al.	2019	300.754	33.567	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	300.742	33.528	0.497	0.271	-3.132	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	300.73	33.567	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	300.75	33.57	–	-1.81	-6.49	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	300.735	33.57	–	0.6	-3.93	-20.5
Gozha et al.	2012	300.75	33.57	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	300.744	33.572	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2007	300.75	33.57	–	0.23	–	-20.5
Kharchenko et al.	2005	300.75	33.57	–	0.6	-4.41	-20.5
Dias et al.	2002	300.75	33.57	–	-1.81	-6.49	-2.87

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	Bfr	BSS
Li et al.	2025	1.74	1.01	–	648	0.172	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.58	1.23	–	624	–	251	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	489*	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.80	1.53	–	417	0.210	–	–	–
He et al.	2023	1.38	0.95	–	50	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.86	1.33	1.36	355	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	355	–	59	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	1.58	1.23	–	624	0.140	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	1.97	0.75	–	794	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.90	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	1.90	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.90	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	0.85	0.46	–	355	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	0.85	0.46	–	355	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	0.80	–	–	562	–	158	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	0.80	0.46	–	562	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	0.80	0.46	–	562	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	0.80	0.46	–	562	–	–	–	–

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3