ASCC 11
(MWSC 284; Teutsch J0332.2+4450; FoF 2205)
0.97
UTI
0.85
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
26.6 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.85 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
ASCC 11 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 53.044 | 44.848 | 1.171 | 0.909 | -3.066 | -16.549 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 53.056 | 44.856 | 1.141 | 0.926 | -3.03 | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 53.058 | 44.856 | 1.183 | 0.904 | -3.07 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 53.078 | 44.879 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 53.041 | 44.85 | 1.14 | 0.919 | -3.075 | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 53.05 | 44.841 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 53.05 | 44.841 | 1.171 | 0.905 | -3.072 | -17.285 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 53.054 | 44.844 | 1.172 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 53.05 | 44.841 | 1.171 | 0.905 | -3.072 | -17.285 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 53.054 | 44.897 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 53.059 | 44.839 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 53.043 | 44.843 | 1.173 | 0.912 | -3.07 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 53.029 | 44.877 | 1.154 | 0.898 | -3.067 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 53.078 | 44.879 | 1.142 | 0.95 | -3.022 | -14.242 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 53.056 | 44.856 | 1.141 | 0.926 | -3.03 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 53.056 | 44.856 | 1.141 | 0.926 | -3.03 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 53.017 | 44.853 | 1.138 | 0.965 | -3.013 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 53.056 | 44.856 | â | â | â | -14.43 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 53.066 | 44.842 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 53.056 | 44.856 | 1.141 | 0.926 | -3.03 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 53.059 | 44.839 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 53.071 | 44.84 | â | -0.05 | -3.72 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 53.07 | 44.84 | â | 1.26 | -4.75 | 0.7 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 53.071 | 44.84 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 53.07 | 44.84 | â | 1.26 | -4.75 | 0.73 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 53.058 | 44.834 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 53.07 | 44.84 | â | 0.35 | â | 0.73 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 53.07 | 44.84 | â | 0.15 | -5.01 | -3.45 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 53.071 | 44.84 | â | 1.26 | -4.75 | -3.24 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.845 | 0.84 | 1.0 | 270 | -0.056 | 608 | 0.48 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.79 | 0.76 | â | 419 | -0.149 | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 1.36 | 1.01 | â | 98 | 0.500 | 915 | 0.46 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.85 | 0.92 | â | 457 | â | 692 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.87 | 0.60 | â | 624 | -0.055 | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.266(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 688(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.88 | 0.92 | â | 245 | 0.210 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 234 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.83 | 0.97 | â | 277 | -0.121 | 529(1) | 0.50 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 221 | â | 162 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 1.00 | â | 282 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.85 | â | â | 263 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.85 | 0.92 | â | 457 | -0.056 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.87 | 0.60 | â | 245 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.85 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 100 | 0.500 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.85 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.85 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.84 | 0.84 | â | 221 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.84 | 0.84 | â | 221 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.65 | â | â | 407 | â | 145 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 0.84 | 0.84 | â | 221 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.65 | 0.46 | â | 407 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.65 | 0.46 | â | 407 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.65 | 0.46 | â | 407 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.