ASCC 105

(MWSC 3157; FoF 2423)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.95 UTI
0.77
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 20.0 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.77 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
ASCC 105 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 295.454 27.366 1.783 1.383 -1.613 -17.225
Li et al. 2025 295.548 27.366 1.783 1.464 -1.635 –
Wei et al. 2025 295.491 27.358 1.775 1.372 -1.614 –
Almeida et al. 2025 295.629 27.364 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 295.589 27.493 1.756 1.396 -1.626 –
Zhang et al. 2024 295.472 27.386 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 295.472 27.386 1.776 1.37 -1.618 -16.192
Cavallo et al. 2024 295.499 27.296 1.775 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 295.472 27.386 1.776 1.37 -1.618 -16.192
Almeida et al. 2023 295.577 27.424 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 295.385 27.381 – – – –
He et al. 2022 295.473 27.403 1.783 1.372 -1.609 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 295.54 27.402 1.8 1.416 -1.602 –
Dias et al. 2021 295.629 27.364 1.786 1.461 -1.611 -14.302
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 295.548 27.366 1.783 1.464 -1.635 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 295.548 27.366 1.783 1.464 -1.635 –
Liu & Pang 2019 295.52 27.407 1.778 1.408 -1.535 –
Bossini et al. 2019 295.548 27.366 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 295.548 27.366 – – – -13.81
Bica et al. 2019 295.443 27.379 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 295.548 27.366 1.783 1.464 -1.635 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 295.385 27.381 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 295.442 27.38 – -2.05 -4.11 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 295.39 27.383 – 0.8 -4.45 -18.8
Gozha et al. 2012 295.442 27.38 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 295.428 27.375 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 295.44 27.38 – 0.6 – -18.75
Kharchenko et al. 2005 295.44 27.38 – 0.91 -3.76 -18.75
Dias et al. 2002 295.442 27.38 – 0.91 -3.76 -18.75

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 0.54 0.37 – 144 0.053 – – –
Wei et al. 2025 0.79 0.73 – 65 0.250 187 0.22 –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.55 0.45 – 213 – 144 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.57 0.41 – 78 0.051 – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.111* – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 222* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.58 0.72 – 45 0.040 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.54 0.30 0.84 93 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 0.55 0.77 – 131 -0.252 304* 0.79 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 81 – 27 – –
He et al. 2022 – 0.55 – 71 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.56 – – 76 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.55 0.45 – 213 0.051 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.57 0.41 – 74 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.55 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 66 -0.250 – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 0.52 0.34 – 99 0.000 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 0.55 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.55 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 0.49 0.32 – 81 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 0.49 0.32 – 81 – – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 0.50 – – 100 – 562 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.50 0.28 – 100 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.50 0.28 – 100 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 0.50 0.28 – 100 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸