Archinal 1
(MWSC 3021)
0.81
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.78
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
33.3 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.78 Well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Archinal 1 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 283.713 | 5.547 | 0.524 | -0.199 | -1.734 | 13.415 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 283.717 | 5.556 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 283.709 | 5.55 | 0.512 | -0.273 | -1.862 | 48.38 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 283.749 | 5.577 | 0.538 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 283.709 | 5.55 | 0.512 | -0.273 | -1.862 | 48.38 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 283.703 | 5.538 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 283.717 | 5.556 | 0.548 | -0.286 | -1.534 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 283.709 | 5.55 | 0.526 | -0.225 | -1.578 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 283.709 | 5.55 | 0.526 | -0.225 | -1.578 | â |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 283.704 | 5.553 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 283.709 | 5.55 | 0.526 | -0.225 | -1.578 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 283.703 | 5.538 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 283.704 | 5.548 | â | 2.03 | 2.4 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 283.71 | 5.54 | â | -0.29 | -3.13 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 283.704 | 5.548 | â | -0.29 | -3.13 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.74 | 4.71 | 2.64 | 12 | 0.459 | 243 | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.74 | 4.57 | â | 10 | â | 243 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1876(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.39 | 5.13 | â | 7 | 0.800 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.71 | 6.00 | 2.64 | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 100 | â | 14 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.74 | 4.57 | â | 10 | 0.118 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.80 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.80 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.45 | 4.71 | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.45 | 4.71 | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.41 | 4.71 | â | 13 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Bronze sample.