Antalova 2

(MWSC 2610; OCL 1021.1)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.59 UTI
0.55
CN
0.42
Cdens
0.5
CC3
0.73
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 2.0 [pc], 2.1 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.55 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 0.42 Loose
  • CC3 0.5 Intermediate quality
  • Clit 0.73 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Antalova 2 is a moderately populated, loose object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Liu et al. (2025)
Classified as primordial binary cluster 28 along with NGC_6383, and of multiple system 13 along with NGC_6383 and Theia_1645.

Palma et al. (2025)
Part of multiple system G5, along with NGC_6383 and Theia_1645.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Wood sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.80 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.80 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.178, e_all=0.3065.

Morales et al. (2013)
Classified as morphological type 'OC2' (totally exposed cluster without correlation with ATLASGAL emission). Morphological flag: exposed cluster, without submm emission.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 262.487 -32.551 0.875 2.019 -1.552 -13.825
Liu et al. 2025 262.44 -32.55 0.87 2.02 -1.49 -15.55
Almeida et al. 2025 262.47 -32.522 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 262.444 -32.551 0.875 2.025 -1.487 -15.549
Celli et al. 2024 262.462 -32.541 – – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 262.494 -32.56 0.871 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 262.444 -32.551 0.875 2.025 -1.487 -15.549
Almeida et al. 2023 262.491 -32.518 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 262.47 -32.522 0.846 2.118 -1.621 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 262.462 -32.541 0.842 2.037 -1.65 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 262.462 -32.541 0.842 2.037 -1.65 –
Bica et al. 2019 262.438 -32.553 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 262.462 -32.541 0.842 2.037 -1.65 –
Dib et al. 2018 262.41 -32.48 – – – –
Joshi et al. 2016 262.41 -32.48 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 262.4 -32.48 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 262.41 -32.48 – -5.87 -0.58 –
Morales et al. 2013 262.425 -32.483 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 262.421 -32.48 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 262.425 -32.483 – -0.15 -2.97 –
Lynga 1987 262.418 -32.505 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.26 1.92 1.93 8 0.014 152 0.61 –
Liu et al. 2025 2.02 0.49 – 6 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.08 1.17 – 8 – 107 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 1.11 1.60 1.93 8 – 175(1) – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 12 – 143 – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.74 2.24 – 13 -0.970 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.11 1.59 1.93 8 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.18 1.34 – 6 0.019 161(1) 0.61 –
Dias et al. 2021 1.08 1.17 – 8 0.014 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.06 1.15 – 12 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 1.31 2.30 – 79 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.15 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.15 – – – – – – –
Dib et al. 2018 1.26 – – 1 – – – –
Joshi et al. 2016 1.26 11.76 – 1 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.26 11.76 – 1 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.26 11.76 – 1 – – – –
Morales et al. 2013 3.50 – – 1259 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 3.65(1) 11.96 – 1259 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 3.50 12.30 – 1259 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸