Alessi 6
(MWSC 2240; FoF 2277)
0.91
UTI
0.81
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
13.4 [arcmin]
- CN 0.81 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Alessi 6 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 220.063 | -66.125 | 1.124 | -10.534 | -5.547 | -14.369 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 220.058 | -66.127 | 1.1 | -10.472 | -5.559 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 220.086 | -66.136 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 220.124 | -66.126 | 1.089 | -10.524 | -5.516 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 220.011 | -66.137 | 1.126 | -10.543 | -5.535 | -14.862 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 220.066 | -66.102 | 1.13 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 220.011 | -66.137 | 1.126 | -10.543 | -5.535 | -14.862 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 220.006 | -66.074 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 220.119 | -66.118 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 220.086 | -66.123 | 1.133 | -10.559 | -5.531 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 219.968 | -66.126 | 1.126 | -10.529 | -5.531 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 220.086 | -66.136 | 1.101 | -10.483 | -5.55 | -14.197 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 220.058 | -66.127 | 1.1 | -10.472 | -5.559 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 220.058 | -66.127 | 1.1 | -10.472 | -5.559 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 220.086 | -66.127 | 1.108 | -10.512 | -5.545 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 220.058 | -66.127 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 220.058 | -66.127 | â | â | â | -14.35 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 220.07 | -66.12 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 220.058 | -66.127 | 1.1 | -10.472 | -5.559 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 220.119 | -66.118 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 220.132 | -66.12 | â | -8.2 | -5.9 | 9.2 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 220.038 | -66.115 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 220.038 | -66.115 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 220.05 | -66.175 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 220.06 | -66.12 | â | -6.2 | -6.22 | â |
| Alessi et al. | 2003 | 220.05 | -66.175 | â | -7.3 | -4.3 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.91 | 0.68 | â | 595 | 0.244 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.86 | 0.88 | â | 610 | â | 414 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.89 | 0.70 | â | 517 | 0.147 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 496* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.89 | 0.89 | â | 417 | 0.290 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 366 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.86 | 1.23 | â | 421 | -0.191 | 598* | 0.57 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 209 | â | 237 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 1.10 | â | 355 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.87 | â | â | 447 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.86 | 0.88 | â | 610 | 0.148 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.89 | 0.70 | â | 427 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.89 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 347 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.81 | 0.72 | â | 598 | -0.382 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.89 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.89 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.61 | 0.59 | â | 209 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.61 | 0.59 | â | 209 | -0.154 | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.44 | 0.59 | â | 200 | â | 64* | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.44 | 0.59 | â | 200 | â | 19 | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 0.44 | 0.59 | â | 158 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.44 | 0.59 | â | 200 | â | â | â | â |
| Alessi et al. | 2003 | 0.44 | 0.59 | â | 158 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Dias et al. (2002)
Asterism (Alessi, B. S. 2005, private communication)