Alessi 5

(MWSC 1844; FoF 2407; OCSN 138)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 83.7 [N/pc2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Alessi 5 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a low-mass, near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 160.833 -61.089 2.508 -15.386 2.526 10.065
Li et al. 2025 160.819 -61.081 2.501 -15.411 2.503 –
Wei et al. 2025 160.83 -61.039 2.514 -15.351 2.469 –
Almeida et al. 2025 160.621 -61.118 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 160.904 -61.086 2.484 -15.376 2.542 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 160.902 -61.111 2.497 -15.4 2.544 13.41
Cavallo et al. 2024 160.827 -61.086 2.509 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 160.902 -61.111 2.497 -15.4 2.544 13.41
Qin et al. 2023 160.87 -61.09 2.5 -15.36 2.52 9.65
Just et al. 2023 160.824 -61.166 – – – –
He et al. 2022 160.7 -61.029 2.502 -15.453 2.556 –
Dias et al. 2021 160.621 -61.118 2.492 -15.363 2.537 11.504
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 160.819 -61.081 2.501 -15.411 2.503 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 160.819 -61.081 2.501 -15.411 2.503 –
Liu & Pang 2019 160.691 -61.076 2.494 -15.354 2.569 –
Bossini et al. 2019 160.819 -61.081 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 160.819 -61.081 – – – 12.49
Bica et al. 2019 160.777 -61.165 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 160.819 -61.081 2.501 -15.411 2.503 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 160.785 -61.167 – -14.33 4.4 8.2
Kharchenko et al. 2016 160.824 -61.166 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 160.783 -61.167 – -2.62 -1.91 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 160.83 -61.17 – -12.5 2.42 8.2
Gozha et al. 2012 160.783 -61.167 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 160.777 -61.165 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 160.78 -61.17 – 0.3 – 12.8
Piskunov et al. 2007 160.777 -61.165 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 160.725 -61.2 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 160.78 -61.17 – -14.56 3.77 12.8
Alessi et al. 2003 160.725 -61.2 – -14.3 4.4 –
Dias et al. 2002 160.783 -61.167 – -14.33 4.4 18.0

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 0.4 0.48 0.73 51 0.000 37 0.17 –
Li et al. 2025 0.44 0.57 – 54 0.048 – – –
Wei et al. 2025 0.51 0.76 – 41 0.000 492 0.17 –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.40 0.40 – 61 – 408 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.42 0.62 – 49 0.063 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 684(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.41 0.85 – 26 0.130 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.38 0.40 0.73 56 – – – –
Qin et al. 2023 0.48 0.59 – 56 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 58 – 18 – –
He et al. 2022 – 0.50 – 40 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.42 – – 68 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 0.40 0.40 – 61 0.064 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.42 0.62 – 68 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.40 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 34 -0.250 – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 0.35 0.59 – 53 -0.133 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 0.40 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.40 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 0.42 0.46 – 40 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 0.38 0.64 – 58 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 0.38 0.64 – 58 -0.382 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 0.40 – – 40 – 37 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.40 0.46 – 51 – 18(1) – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 0.40 0.46 – 51 – 9 – –
van den Bergh 2006 0.40 0.46 – 40 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.40 0.46 – 51 – – – –
Alessi et al. 2003 0.40 0.46 – 40 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 0.40 0.46 – 40 -0.382 – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸