Alessi 37
(ASCC 124; MWSC 3663)
0.95
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
11.2 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Alessi 37 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 341.958 | 46.314 | 1.413 | 0.352 | -1.659 | -15.267 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 341.961 | 46.342 | 1.384 | 0.351 | -1.569 | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 341.916 | 46.366 | 1.421 | 0.354 | -1.673 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 342.019 | 46.328 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | -18.107 | 46.39 | 1.354 | 0.333 | -1.705 | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 341.971 | 46.29 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 341.971 | 46.29 | 1.384 | 0.335 | -1.643 | -13.91 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 341.898 | 46.506 | 1.381 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 341.971 | 46.29 | 1.384 | 0.335 | -1.643 | -13.91 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 341.94 | 46.341 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 341.888 | 46.306 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 341.937 | 46.308 | 1.414 | 0.354 | -1.677 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 341.968 | 46.33 | 1.411 | 0.34 | -1.669 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 342.019 | 46.328 | 1.375 | 0.355 | -1.579 | -10.602 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 341.961 | 46.342 | 1.384 | 0.351 | -1.569 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 341.961 | 46.342 | 1.384 | 0.351 | -1.569 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 341.942 | 46.337 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 341.961 | 46.342 | â | â | â | -10.48 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 342.025 | 46.252 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 341.961 | 46.342 | 1.384 | 0.351 | -1.569 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 342.03 | 46.252 | â | -0.82 | -2.75 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 341.888 | 46.306 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 342.033 | 46.252 | â | -0.82 | -2.75 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 341.895 | 46.31 | â | 0.14 | -0.78 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 341.895 | 46.31 | â | 0.41 | -0.78 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 342.026 | 46.252 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 342.026 | 46.252 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 342.03 | 46.25 | â | 1.34 | -2.41 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 342.033 | 46.252 | â | -0.82 | -2.75 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.7 | 0.54 | 1.15 | 182 | 0.030 | 309 | 0.355 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.71 | 0.54 | â | 233 | 0.062 | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 1.09 | 1.07 | â | 44 | 0.000 | 463 | 0.19 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.71 | 0.68 | â | 232 | â | 331 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.70 | 0.47 | â | 182 | 0.061 | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.065(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 331(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.73 | 0.58 | â | 204 | 0.340 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.69 | 0.41 | 1.15 | 125 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.70 | 0.65 | â | 261 | -0.009 | 309(1) | 0.52 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 157 | â | 38 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.80 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.68 | â | â | 145 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.71 | 0.68 | â | 232 | 0.063 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.70 | 0.47 | â | 138 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.71 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.69 | 0.53 | â | 112 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.71 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.71 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.51 | 0.46 | â | 302 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.70 | 0.55 | â | 157 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.70 | 0.55 | â | 157 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 0.70 | 0.55 | â | 155 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.60 | 0.46 | â | 302 | â | 193(1) | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.60 | 0.46 | â | 302 | â | 51 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.60 | 0.46 | â | 302 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.60 | 0.46 | â | 302 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.