Alessi 33
(ASCC 32; MWSC 1069; FoF 2271)
0.96
UTI
0.79
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
11.1 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.79 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Alessi 33 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with 3 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 105.744 | -26.477 | 1.252 | -3.228 | 3.502 | 33.096 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 105.714 | -26.512 | 1.23 | -3.307 | 3.477 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 105.711 | -26.576 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 105.768 | -26.563 | 1.21 | -3.201 | 3.484 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 105.71 | -26.365 | 1.249 | -3.218 | 3.488 | 34.107 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 105.714 | -26.512 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 105.761 | -26.431 | 1.246 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 105.71 | -26.365 | 1.249 | -3.218 | 3.488 | 34.107 |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 105.711 | -26.576 | 1.24 | -3.317 | 3.475 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 105.52 | -26.558 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 105.703 | -26.169 | 1.233 | -3.218 | 3.456 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 105.711 | -26.576 | 1.24 | -3.317 | 3.475 | 34.607 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 105.714 | -26.512 | 1.23 | -3.307 | 3.477 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 105.714 | -26.512 | 1.23 | -3.307 | 3.477 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 105.742 | -26.363 | 1.219 | -3.264 | 3.461 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 105.714 | -26.512 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 105.714 | -26.512 | â | â | â | 35.05 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 105.499 | -26.499 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 105.714 | -26.512 | 1.23 | -3.307 | 3.477 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 105.495 | -26.503 | â | -0.768 | 0.813 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 105.52 | -26.558 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 105.496 | -26.503 | â | -1.47 | 2.32 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 105.525 | -26.56 | â | -2.33 | 4.25 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 105.489 | -26.503 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 105.489 | -26.503 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 105.49 | -26.5 | â | -3.39 | 1.97 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 105.496 | -26.503 | â | -1.47 | 2.32 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.79 | 0.24 | 0.73 | 27 | -0.003 | 380 | 0.36 | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.77 | 0.17 | â | 24 | -0.043 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.79 | 0.22 | â | 27 | â | 697 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.81 | 0.26 | â | 24 | -0.003 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 272(1) | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 25 | â | 560 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.84 | 0.44 | â | 6 | -0.280 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.78 | 0.14 | 0.73 | 16 | â | â | â | â |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 0.79 | 0.22 | â | 27 | -0.003 | 2417 | 0.36 | 0.00 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 164 | â | 220 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.10 | â | 18 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.79 | 0.22 | â | 27 | -0.003 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.81 | 0.26 | â | 25 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.79 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 19 | -0.750 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.73 | 0.22 | â | 25 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.79 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.79 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.79 | 0.23 | â | 155 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.77 | 0.24 | â | 164 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.77 | 0.24 | â | 164 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.75 | 0.25 | â | 151 | â | 380(1) | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.75 | 0.25 | â | 151 | â | 158 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.75 | 0.25 | â | 151 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.75 | 0.25 | â | 151 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.