Alessi 24
(ASCC 89; MWSC 2582; FoF 2389; OCSN 142)
0.97
UTI
0.84
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
30.2 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.84 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Alessi 24 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with 3 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 260.778 | -62.718 | 2.058 | -0.451 | -8.976 | 9.223 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 260.764 | -62.693 | 2.059 | -0.488 | -8.999 | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 260.776 | -62.653 | 2.07 | -0.483 | -8.939 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 260.654 | -62.784 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 260.809 | -62.61 | 2.019 | -0.461 | -8.946 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 260.978 | -62.818 | 2.042 | -0.43 | -8.963 | 9.593 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 260.777 | -62.66 | 2.06 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 260.978 | -62.818 | 2.042 | -0.43 | -8.963 | 9.593 |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 260.85 | -62.66 | 2.07 | -0.48 | -8.96 | 9.67 |
| He et al. | 2022 | 260.842 | -62.678 | 2.07 | -0.46 | -8.95 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 260.962 | -62.61 | 2.045 | -0.505 | -8.957 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 260.654 | -62.784 | 2.063 | -0.481 | -8.932 | 7.304 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 260.764 | -62.693 | 2.059 | -0.488 | -8.999 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 260.764 | -62.693 | 2.059 | -0.488 | -8.999 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 260.826 | -62.701 | 2.051 | -0.389 | -8.956 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 260.764 | -62.693 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 260.764 | -62.693 | â | â | â | 12.32 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 260.992 | -62.864 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 260.764 | -62.693 | 2.059 | -0.488 | -8.999 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 261.0 | -62.864 | â | 1.35 | -8.31 | -6.95 |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 261.004 | -62.863 | â | -1.62 | -5.22 | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 261.004 | -62.863 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 260.804 | -62.641 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 260.82 | -62.64 | â | 1.1 | â | 12.3 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 260.804 | -62.641 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 260.82 | -62.64 | â | 1.35 | -8.31 | 4.0 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 261.004 | -62.863 | â | 1.35 | -8.31 | -6.95 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.5 | 0.31 | 0.53 | 71 | 0.022 | 628 | 0.14 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.47 | 0.30 | â | 85 | -0.034 | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 0.62 | 0.44 | â | 50 | 0.250 | 290 | 0.14 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.48 | 0.24 | â | 286 | â | 227 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.50 | 0.34 | â | 77 | 0.078 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 313(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.51 | 0.46 | â | 26 | -0.070 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.47 | 0.16 | 0.53 | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 0.59 | 0.56 | â | 141 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.30 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.50 | â | â | 74 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.48 | 0.24 | â | 286 | 0.079 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.50 | 0.34 | â | 72 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.48 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 66 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.46 | 0.34 | â | 88 | -0.154 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.48 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.48 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.42 | 0.31 | â | 11 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.50 | â | â | 11 | â | 3090 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.50 | 0.31 | â | 11 | â | 1941(1) | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.50 | 0.31 | â | 11 | â | 944 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.50 | 0.31 | â | 11 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.50 | 0.31 | â | 11 | -0.133 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.